c: *bloats memory allocation with size information, cause stupid ass programmer can't keep track of a number*
stupid ass programmer: *still has to keep track of the size to be able to use the memory in any meaningful way*
@namark the ineffiencies in raw C are a legitimate problem and why, particularly when it comes to memory management, things like Java can be 40x faster or more out of the box.
Slated memory allocation in C is ultimately the way to go but since its not built-in a lot of programmers dont do it.
That said nothing stopping someone from coding up C properly and making sure they do exactly that. I just wish more coders did.
That doesnt remotely address what I specifically said now does it. I never said C cant be made to be as fast as Java. I said out of the box memory allocation in java is over 40x faster than C (using malloc), this is fact. Slkated memory allocation in C can get around this but is mor work for the coder, which is fine, and as such with additional work C can be as faster or faster than java.
QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.