@zleap

When vaccines work they are usually great at stopping the spread. For the original strain of covid, for example, it both stopped symptoms **and** stopped the spread.

The new variants however (such as delta, the most prevalent one, and omicron) it is either completely in effective or significantly less effective (hard to draw firm conclusions off what studies we have). The point is, its not effective at stopping the spread because the spike protein it encodes for is different in the variants and thus the antibodies are ineffective to a significant degree (if not completely).

@khaosgrille

@zleap

yea masks im not sure about. The data in them are questionable in either direction so we can only speculate about how or if they are effective.

I think if you are very strict in how you use them they probably help, but most people, almost no one, handles mask with the level of rigor needed for them to be effective.

@khaosgrille

@zleap @freemo how would u argue against this study for example https://www.pnas.org/content/118/49/e2110117118?

ofc it is not randomised but it is hard to do that with a pandemic disease

@khaosgrille

If it isnt randomized how does it address the points I made at all?

@zleap

@freemo @zleap they take in real world scenarios. they expect people to touch their face, wear the mask wrong, not everyone using one, etc. the study addresses all those points
Follow

@khaosgrille

Ok then ill have to read, my cursory glance didnt seem to see anything about face touching in their model.

Though regardless if its non-randomized observational study it still has the underlying issue of confounding and thus the post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy. But ill give it a full read to give a more proper answer

@zleap

@freemo @zleap tbh not sure if i misunderstood some part regarding leakage in the study

@khaosgrille

At a cursory glance i took leakage to mean particles that escape out of the side. Not the effects of people taking off their mask and touching it and their face constantly.

@zleap

@khaosgrille

I am not seeing anything to address any of the concerns i brought up such as:

* face touching
* constantly pulling the face down to your chin (spreading infection around your face)
* mask reuse
* exposing just the nose
* confounding between mask users and other good habits
* addressing post hoc ergo procter hoc through use of causality tests

etc.

@zleap

@freemo @zleap this study analysed correlations between face touching and mask wearing. seems to be a negative correlation if one at all
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tbed.14094 though i cant find any information if it is peer reviewed

@khaosgrille

Pressuming this study is correct (as you say it doesnt look like it is peer reviewed) then it may be fair to say people touch their face less. But it doesnt negate the other points such as pulling ones mask down to drink infecting both their chin and hands in doing so,

How many times a day does someone take a sip of water? Each of those times is a touch event and it appears this study isnt really counting those.

@zleap

@zleap

In general I'd expect eating and drinking in general, with a virus laiden mask on your face you need to handle (not to mention your now infected chin) to be rather risky.

If people tossed the mask and washed their face **and** hands before eating it might be much safer, but drinking, since it happens so often, seems particularly risky with a mask.

@khaosgrille

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.