He posts this, but still no mention of our situation or any attempt to have a conversation on it... shameful.. seems he looks after his own ass, his own server, but really dont give a rats ass about when it hurts other instances.
QT: mastodon.social/@Gargron/10938

Eugen Rochko  
There were two notable moderation incidents on mastodon.social and mastodon.online in the past 24 hours that I would like to address. In the first,...

@freemo i think it's a combination of german leftwing being very much anti free speech combined with fears about risking support from the german government which also hates free speech - mastodon gGmbH is a tax exempt company after all ;)

Follow

We no longer reference free speech in our ToC partly for that reason.

@bonifartius

Β· Β· 1 Β· 0 Β· 0

@freemo i'm not exactly happy with that change tbh, but i can understand your reasons for it :)

i think that it's a slippery slope to replace "free speech" because from my experience the people who are against free speech are never satisfied.

if anything, don't let this whole thing affect your health, it clearly isn't worth it :blobcathug: !

@bonifartius Functionally its not a change at all.. We just say "Academic Freedom" instead, which honestly is a better descriptor anyway.

I agree it is a shame we had to do it, but it doesnt really change anything.

@freemo for me it feels just wrong that qoto is bullied into doing these things while it always was a nice place with nice people who discuss things in a civil way. maybe with opposing ideas but not in bad faith.

@freemo @bonifartius "free speech" does not not imply others (including other servers admins) to listen to it and tolerate it on their instances. one can speak/write whatever he wants, nobody can prevent him from this. but he does not have a right to make others to listen/read what he says/writes. this is simple and no one is ought anything to the others. every server has its right and it's up to the admin of the server. there's no problem with this. admin can ban some other servers if he got tired deleting inapropriate posts/spam/flood/porn/ads/etc from them. and I understand admins very well because I administrate many servers for years myself and combating different shit in content is a bothersome task. sometimes it's easier to ban the whole domain to stop the flood. and admins set up rules for their servers. they pay for servers and maintain them. so this is absolutely normal they have their views on what should be on their servers and what should not. different admins may not agree about some points. this is also normal. but this is not a drama, this just helps avoiding senseless holywars like on birdsite. people can choose the server they like and that's it.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.