I assume you agree that holds equally true for the original post then, since I made it a point to use the same informal approach with the same parameters as the OP (and for a reason(.
Hahah fair.. well I would never claim these casual posts constitute valid rigerous peer-reviewed scientific content. Even though ive done this analysis many times as a professional data scientist, and have seen nothing but validity in this assessment, even that doesnt count as a proper peer-reviewed rigorous assertion, obviously. But until I see good science that disagrees with it ill stick with it.
@freemo @rdaily
I'm not sure it is the way we do science ;)