Without even looking I can already guess he just looked down a list and picked anyone who was a minority... for an pro-segregationist he really has the community buying his pandering.... unsurprisingly his tactic works.
When i saw his VP pick, Kamala with a horrific history **against** women and blacks I already knew his game... just more confirmation.
I guess his top priority is just covering up his pro-segregation past... seems to work.
@SETIEric Ok, but we are talking about the left and Joe right now... while that information would be great, particularly if you have some sources, and id love to hear more... im not sure what hte relevance is here.
I often see criticisms of one party being countered with discussing the other party.. why, the other party doing evil things has no bearing ont he evil things your party is doing. I am not more ok with the shit the right does, but lets not use it to distract from the topic being discussed.
@SETIEric Neither, I thought I was quite clear what my issue was with all of Bidens picks... and in my explanation i never once said anythig about the bar association so i have no idea what your on about.
I listed some specific examples in the thread already, the issue is biden tends to pick people whose history is almost as bad as his own as a pro-segregationist.
@freemo So were any of these appointments rated unqualified by the bar association, or is it just the lack of whiteness that's the problem?
Is there a lack of whiteness? I went to the June 28th apointments and I can't tell anyones' race. Can you? Last stat I heard was that Bidens picks are about 40% white. Is that a problem?
What's the overall racial makeup of the Judiciary? Well, it's 78% white, significantly higher than the population. So maybe that the problem that needs resolving.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2023/06/28/president-biden-names-thirty-fifth-round-of-judicial-nominees-and-one-new-nominee-to-serve-as-u-s-attorney/