I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

My question is: are you willing to threaten people with death for a social safety net?

>So the base notion that there is a threat of violence is correct, but the consequences are variable depending upon congruence of the actual goals of policy makers and enforcers with the goals of the people.
If the goals of the people and the goals of policy makers are aligned, then why is violence necessary?
Follow

@Hyolobrika

As established, simply not paying taxes will never equate to a death of threat. Not paying will never get you jail time or any criminal threats. You will be sued by the IRS, loose, and have your money taken virtually without a single threat being made.

Not saying if this is right or wrong, but trying to equate taxes with a death threat isnt accurate (even though associating criminal laws with death threats has some validity)

@admitsWrongIfProven

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.