Is there a rule name (in the style of “Dvorak’s Law” or “Hanlon’s Razor”) for the idea that “the encryption wasn’t compromised, rather there was a man on the inside”?

Follow

@levisan

That would fall under Occams razor, the answer the requires the fewest unjustified assumptions usually right.

Also Sagan's Razor would also apply extraordinary claims (like breaking encryption) require extraordinary evidence.

@freemo Aha yes, both apply well! I hadn't thought of looking at it that way

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.