Ask not what you can do for your country, ask what your country can do for you
🇳🇱
Not deport me, not deport **legal** immigrants, and not making me fear for my freedom would be a nice start.
@realcaseyrollins How ya figure? Trump explicitly is screaming at the top of his lungs about deporting citizens.. how is it not his fault
@freemo When did he do that?
> “It’s a legal question that the president is looking into,” Leavitt answered.
>
> She said that Trump “would only consider this, if legal, for Americans who are the most violent, egregious, repeat offenders of crime who nobody in this room wants living in their communities.”
"Screaming at the top of his lungs about deporting citizens"? Haha
@lnxw37a2 @freemo Interesting. Well, if this is something he's actually wanting and planning on doing, that'd be a little different than something #Trump has casually mentioned doing if legal (it's not). For now this is mostly seeming like the whole " #Trump said to inject yourself with bleach" thing
Dude you are acting like a fool for the first time, ever... These are thigns he is actively doing.. he has arrested a judge already for enforcing her ruling, he has deported people against judges rullings he cant, without due process, people here under the protection of the law.
These arent random off the cuff things he is saying, it is a pattern of action that he has clearly followed through on every step of the way.
> When did this happen?
Just last month. Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested on Trump's order because ICE wanted to block her rulling and hide in her court room and arrest the immigrant when he comes in for his hearing to determine the legality of his case (what we call due process). Despite the judge specifically ordering it illegal to deport him without due process the FBI arrested the judge and then deported the individual.
> Presuming those people don't have lawful deportation orders, he should stop doing that
Yes he should stop doing this, he clearly has no intention of stopping. He even sent out a memo telling ICE to ignore the need for search warrants or due process.
Thats the problem, even when the supreme court tells him to stop, he wont... thats the point.
> Judge Hannah Dugan was arrested on Trump's order because ICE wanted to block her rulling
What #HannahDugan ruling was #Trump / #ICE trying to stop?
ICE was trying to stop a rulling that may have found the individual innocent and prevented them from having any course of action to deport him. They are trying to deport people without due process, his memo explicitly revealed they are trying to get people deported by avoiding court cases, meaning based on simply accusations without any due process.
In this case Eduardo Flores-Ruiz was accused of domestic abuse, without any court ruling if the accusation was valid or not. ICE wanted to deport him without due process, the judge insisted he had a right to a hearing to determine if he was guilty before using as a grounds for a deportation. Therefore she was arrested so ICE could deport the man without his constitutionally protected due process.
"being here illegally"... as ruled by what court? Thats the point you arent getting here. Until a court rules your here illegally, then you arent, thats the point. Crimes need to be ruled in court before they are determined...
You are familiar with innocent until proven guilty right?
ITs a bit more than that.. Every single person deported has access to a hearing (albeit summarily) on deportion. So yes, they do.
We have a fast-track process, and in that process there are two check points where the immigrant can demand a hearing.
There is a gross difference between a fast-track process where an immigrant **opts** not to ask for a hearing, and is deported summarily, vs rushing someone out int he middle of the night against a judges orders.... not even comparable.
I just did a whole right up ont he fast-track process and the various points where a person is garunteed judicial review should they invoke it.
ITs a bit more than that.. Every single person deported has access to a hearing (albeit summarily) on deportion. So yes, they do.
We have a fast-track process, and in that process there are two check points where the immigrant can demand a hearing.
There is a gross difference between a fast-track process where an immigrant **opts** not to ask for a hearing, and is deported summarily, vs rushing someone out int he middle of the night against a judges orders.... not even comparable.
I just did a whole right up ont he fast-track process and the various points where a person is garunteed judicial review should they invoke it.
@freemo @lnxw37a2
> he has arrested a judge already for enforcing her ruling
When did this happen?
> he has deported people against judges rullings he cant, without due process
Presuming those people don't have lawful deportation orders, he should stop doing that