While I might agree not to try in never-ending ways with same person/people. I think it is needed even if on first look the person doesn't believe or agree to try another way indirectly or directly.

Many sub-reasons are about technique or timing, environment. To come back after a while or show a diagram instead of text, all all somewhere else can help see things much better.
Sub-Reasons that help person say which part is at fault, their prejudices presently in their brain - the picture for example in their head with a certain word while the logics jump to thinking this or that, charity is hippy or whatever.

Something is there, it's also about your belief in your technique, and temperament, sociable equipment you have, and many things that can allow you to measurably work, AND THEN EXIT.
A conditional thing or time thing often ends up the stale-mate or check-mate that nobody has time or sees the point in listening or just hang out with same crowds
#hackers perhaps though much more available nowadays as they see gender, code of conduct, education and ALL of life needed (not just computer though one or two millions are still stuck there in computer-thinking)

So anyway believing you can say something and find some commonality is your things AND theirs. If you get 0 back, can't hack, can't track, then maybe it's wack!

All the while a 2nd I would attempt why ? Because both sayer and receiver are currently in this revolution happening in itself; to tolerate people, to give time since much of Capitalisms xyz design is deliberately cutting it out, and also just not be scared.... etc etc could do a podcast on it)

Overall all is needed on many levels (maybe not by public figures all the time) but we lower ranks do a certain amount of the disposable work using our time to level up, but almost it works oppositely too (all can strangly work) where *especially* if you have weight as a public figure or higher skills in something else THEN it still can be a MASSIVE impact you "Mother Theresa / Gandhi it" and do a visit or tap on the shoulder to people and bless a few people in passing on the way to your conference or going up the mountain (or whatever famous people do) and give anyone / someone some 'awe' or even 'confusion' to "why did he do that?" or to think about it from high to low level person.

So all this can be like a 'thrown-away' portion of one's effort (throw a few cents or seed and see if it grows) and some classic morality leverage and guilty-tripping in measured approach I think is very wise :) <--- ducks the tomatoes and shoes being thrown!

And however this quote was meant or said I think it's important to say and knowing THAT QUOTES ARE VERY MISLEADING even in the positive sense misleading so I'm even more delighted if you were to tack on what you were reading or encourage why you add here a bit cold / unpersonally as a post!!!

....or it's if it's just a feel-good post or fan post of Satoshi Nakamoto, please say

Thanks @skells

Picture said:
"If you don't believe it or don't get it I don't have time to convince you, sorry - Satoshi Nakamoto
https://qoto.org/@skells/107619796043168852