@dpwiz
Pretty good connection between data store as people themselves
(did I catch this right?)
And can you say more? (even if it's not perfect but going for speed). Thanks
@freeschool The problem is not that user data is placed in a corporate data center in a "wrong" country. Moving data across the borders is not a solution for users' problems. A user still has no say in where their data is located and on what terms. Some people wouldn't trust their "countries" to hold a glass of water for them and certainly would not let their "digital footprint" into a country that has an adversarial stance to its minorities.
@dpwiz
Ok got that... seems a bit more is there with the kinda of sentiment that "The data should be stored inside the person themselves."...
so could you say more about that? (connection to digital with storing in our self, maybe some examples and ideals, or possibilities. I get the trust is not here... so imagine also maybe none of them can be trusted (that all are being used as users- if I get that right, so what would you like or recommend?)
@dpwiz
I'm grateful.
Just flipping to another side (briefly) do you think 'holding' data in terms of person could be something digital in part but mostly in the person themself... so digital aside (but not discounted) somehow making that the focus - do you see that as possible or somehow have any thoughts on that even with a bit of digital... and considering the body is perhaps less digital to take over itself... (at least in some respect or just not limiting the digital aggression by using it less or another way).
Appreciate this is tangential or different but the idea of holding things like a container seems interesting as people did before with knowledge and practise (without also expecting it all and still have a bit of digital but perhaps trying to catch the old ways a bit more somehow and have less digital liability).
Last points were covered well so thought I'd ask about this slightly new take on it... Thanks