Clever but racist people / clever users even with unwanted things...
Clever but racist people - which still can win win in many ways in the realm of contact... because if you can get past racist things (not ignore but take the other measured points) then they WIN over those people are
- inexpressive (people who can't from lack of practice or lack of feeling sense in worth constructing any sense from it all.. and more reasons)
- they are measurably clever / more active / more connecting to other things 9even bad included is interesting and perhaps part of human nature with the anime prom or whatever)
- they are not scared (THIS IS ALMOST TOP OF THE LIST where you might have clever but silent people or clever but racist still-quite-correct-on-many-points people)
So while I want to say normal people are better for being less dangerous, actually it turns out over the internet or in real life passive people are perhaps most unuseful (notice I wanted to say useless but I want people to also have the right to do nothing for others in terms of free speech or building the mind even though I feel they might be ignorantly doing so... I think for a while is ok but not politically respecting one's self is a problem).
Will revise this if any major flaws- feel free to help or forever assume I'm not far off many correlating points. And also practising speech in case I'm wrong and happily can be pointed out how :) (....for example someone not talking / try vs. someone racists doing and trying while being quite logical in many other ways)
Do also remember when you see crap THAT IS PEOPLE ->meaning if you really asked people and their misconception you'd realise how far out they are and this is what bring it out has as advantage to silent kind of suffocation or allowance of bad things.
From time to time is does work to give these people and profile time rather than the same-same people (who for example don't even reply )
@Pat I don't know @Pat if you are playing an unsaid game here, With you it's been unclear humour (like: I'll say something random to get you to think about it in a different way) or just missing the point in a other type of reply... so this is my consideration with you at the moment. The last part of reply makes a bit of sense but it's like the first is off. Anyway... just for myself then:
This writing was about looking objectively. So putting aside your feelings and go for something else in learning.
This is not about racism itself but putting aside that so you can take from people measurably since they are measurably more participatory in more things (and quite sanely that can be looked at which you should measure yourself) and at least they are able to dissect, point out and reply... probably from being intelligent / practised in expressed / not fearing how they look.
... which compared to other people who are quite non-participatory people / just unresponsive / not-really-present internet people / just scared of others (or whatever else that I might respect a bit and say 'fair enough' to, still renders them total sheep and almost non-human practitioners...
Simply not really operating a human and even a minimum I see as responsible / learning or even 'getting there'.
I think I'm not going to spell too much out for you in further posts since this also might be a kind of joke or exploration - so take this all as a bonus effort be me, even if it's no fault of your own. And even re-read the first text. And then your reply.
@freeschool
My reply was not a joke.
I reread your post 3-4 times before my first reply to try to understand it. I have great difficulty understanding your toots sometimes, but I try anyway.
The headline of your post was: "Clever but racist people..."
So that is what I thought it was about.
My reply was about responding and speaking up, within the context of bullying/racism, so you can read it as that and maybe it is useful.
Yes, people should participate even if others don't like what they say or how they say it.