@barefootstache
Seems nice as a thought but I guess I'm tempted to go deeper...
So for me selfishly perhaps it's demonstrating maths... and perhaps wasn't about climate other than some basic ins and out... but for me missing simple things like how much it takes to make a plane / maintain it (as opposed to train or car)... (financial cost AND energy input)
then the fuel they need maybe but no need go that far even...
Car seems manageable per 1-5 person... airplane seems almost opposite or just everything hi-tech massive.
I feel like modern life is when industrial damage is done first and "savings" are made... like a lot of scams (do dirty / intensive work and then make it easy and 'cheap')... and maybe airplanes and train travel light all the time which is why I like when they only flytwice a week.
Borderline rant I can adjust. The industry seems riddled with big spends and public money dumps / subsidies...
Right now, seems clever maths which is mostly for end user and not about damage overall (of course who can measure that, only they know) and then it's cheaper / economical after all that (financially rather than economic' as in planet resources / precious metals, heat or special hi-tech things needed).
Just the machinery and personnel needed to make and maintain all those flying dildos, spare parts, captains driving them like airbuses... crazy complex,