#DailyBloggingChallenge (212/250)
Always thought that tree rinds would make good kindling until recently while trying to start a #fireplace and it failing after multiple attempts. Under closer inspection I realized that they were producing a lot of smoke but not feeding the fire.
Further I suspect, even if the rinds are under cover, though stored outside, that they can sponge up some of the humidity and thus leading to the higher smoke amount, especially if it rain in the recent time.
#DailyBloggingChallenge (213/250)
The only #firemaking technique I was taught by my father was the teepee method and it seems like the standard that most people (only) know.
When showing such people the top down method aka the self feeding method, they excuse it with "it is impossible" or "that is not how fire physics works".
#DailyBloggingChallenge (214/250)
There are three general phases when creating a fire.
The phases being:
1. The initial lighting phase until the first coals appear.
2. Initial coals exist though still have initial kindling and/or need be fed consistantly to keep the fire going.
3. No real knowledge or attention needed to keep the fire going. Just occasionally add fuel and ignore for awhile.
#DailyBloggingChallenge (215/250)
The main difference between the teepee method and self feeding method is the direction the coals travel and/or the location of the fuel source in the second phase.
With the teepee method the coals stay at the bottom and the fuel is from above.
Whereas with the self feeding the coals start at the top and slowly burn its way to the bottom and taking the fuel initially from the bottom and later from the sides.
@barefootstache Would be good if you had a picture for each one of these or occasionally.
@freeschool since these posts are meant to be small and later potentially combined into larger formats, will leave the images for such occasions.
The goal of the challenge is to write about a topic in 5-15 min and see if anyone will react to the content. Once sufficient feedback exists, then a larger one will be fashioned with images and references.
@barefootstache Makes sense to keep it small like that.
Are you looking for reaction?
Kind of why or what would be ideal because the posts don't seem to be asking for reaction (although maybe no need) or have much purpose other than info.
So I was all good until you said you want to "see if anyone will react to the content" - asking as just a small question about that.
@freeschool e.g. fact checking, or "have you looked at it from this angle", or questioning the validity, or simply favoriting or boosting