Follow

Browser only RSS / No-App + Privacy-minded vs. extensions 

⬇️ ⬇️
vs. FeedBro

QUESTION + MINI-REVIEW

===========
❓ QUESTION ❓
===========
Considering both software were the same functionally, then I guess you'd take the non-extension one right?... if the implementation wasn't too offending in non-extension version?

=================
Pétrolette RSS reader -
petrolette.space/
=================
­█1/­█ I like the idea you can visit one website to get what you want without extensions (Any bare-bones browser lets you use the RSS reader)
AND
­█2/­█ work / settings are saved *in the browser* !

I like these two, mostly because of how industry can rug-pull whenever they decide (or put money into it) to render any browser useless / near-extinct or at least it's extensions by switching the extensions standard, calling it unsafe or some other way to glitch it all or say no to what is amazing and they want locked out so that some work and some don't...

Something about that basic browser window makes it "browser proof" and falls into "longevity" rather than "oh this was amazing 2 years ago and now they changed it"

=================
Feedbro extension:
nodetics.com/feedbro/
=================
Didn't use yet but will get round to it... or just trust it's as simple or good as advertised (for now)...

The picture they use (also used for this post) is extreme compelling how strong and well RSS can work...

nodetics.com/feedbro/

(Just Browser) vs
( Needs )

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.