My last attempt to ask him about the merits of "Humanising the Movement" - primarily to allow and encourage more audio interaction for those who enjoy it - not everyone but audio messages as an outlet and expression for people and growth / improvement in expression in community !

➡️ 🎤 Audio download: 🎤
https://bin.dembased.xyz/audio-for-rmscommunities-more-voice-messages-as-fans-or-feedback-like-speakpipecom-humanising-movements-10mins.mp3

====================
⬇️ MORE DETAIL IF INTERESTED ⬇️
(BUT SEE AUDIO FOR BASICS)
====================
A website can easily allow people to choose to record a message and make the process easier than email (as fans or many types of feedback and expression of topics).
Email will still work for those that really want to Richard Stallman (for example in this case) or to anyone or who is checking on his behalf. I suggested myself to sort things with disclaimer put before that "someone else will be trusted to listen to their email and will also will be disposed of after making notes... because I have done this before and can process 100's a day and make notes / reply fast etc etc showing results and trust... but also it could be his staff or whoever taking this idea - mostly I have more time than almost all the Fediverse who have a job that takes up all their time.

Something more human is also what RMS needs from a largely disconnected / email / text-only movement he / we built up or ended up in so that can be part of something more human, more than not.

Community and Communication go together so intrinsically.

I can filter and note down various notes and make summary... from chalking up another 'thanks' email to 10 people mentioning the same thing and don't have Facebook account (RMS has only a 1 way only account on Fediverse) - so audio or more ways might be 100% better than ignoring and even being overwhelmed by emaill...

ALSO SOME "TIME" METRICS
- 5 emails = 5mins minimum (maybe 20minutes)
or
- 2 audio messages 5mins each but better understanding and better relationship in the end
(even if it's just a 1 ways audio not needed a reply)

I tried to say to RMS "you are behind on emails as you are the bottleneck and only one answering"

in 10minutes audio you often are actually better off explaining in this medium, because in audio you can say a lot more in 1 min than typing text / reading text.

I get more info sometimes and their tone and perspective where email sometimes score Near-0 for understanding "Where the fuck is this person wanting to go or wanting from me?" 10 emails can take more than 10 mins (for each writer and reader which was what was happening with me and RMS and quickly going backwards in progress and repetitive... also fragmented and had to remind him stuff...

So as audio form, if it could be made much easier to send (like 1-click like Telegram, Signal) with near-0 work (like 1 website or copying what speakpipe.com has) then we can really make progress and have variety for many types of people.

This was what my audio suggested to Richard
to check out speakpipe.com and imagine some tweaks.

Voice messages could fill up in a directory and I could filter them!

*** Stallman was only able to listen to 1min from 10mins ***

- so even though he had the audio already, he didn't want to listen onwards...
Quite terrible perhaps and but maybe this is EXACTLY THE EXAMPLE of why things don't work or limited in email-only realm.
(I did also work with him before and work was done fast / enjoyable once clear!)

He did listen to 1min so I am 'thankful' but continuing 9 more minutes audio (lol) could have creatively been done during something else even nonchalant -
so something I think could be since he doesn't get why humanising interaction and audio, even if it's one way - I wasn't saying he had to reply by audio!

He sent me reply saying he didn't see it worth listening to the rest even though he had the audio file downloaded.

So I would like to solve this / practise better and more people doing basically better than 1min!

If you listened to the audio, congrats!

WE CANNOT CONTINUE without voice or with those types that non-starters with more human stuff (is odd to write that but shows how text and computer things are now)

Even by email he was saying repetitive and time consuming 'valuing his time' but wasting it.

Most my life it feels I have found all these types of people or it's most of humanity like talking through computers - just different 'personalities' or different 'species' like cat and dog that don't understand what humanity is or needs, they are almost different animals! But practising better I think can help enjoy the right things again... rather than run away!

This audio might be a project idea for you or a Techie who can set up the same as SpeakPipe.com

All so it can be a human movement for humans !

At least 1 person or 1 setup of it as a test to see what I mean...

Because without humanisms I'm quite sure nothing works and misses the whole point and reinforced differences - and more importantly, without audio, it skips the improvement factor of "as-we-work" human voice and humanism effects - we are not improving without it in plain or 'rich' text!.

I guess most computer-heads just won't get some of these paragraphs... like a kind of cat or dog basically !

But I'm hoping 1 or 2 can be concerned with making this get in touch to make more of a HUMAN movement (which is almost all of them I think aiming to solve human things) and take care of any assumptions not said explicitly here. Just ask

AND BOOST! THANKS

#RMS #Richard #Stallman #COMMUNITIES #Fediverse
#Audio #Movement #Humanity #Humanism #Caring #Help #Helpdesk #Fans #P2P #Communication #Community #QOTO #Feedback