Truth has many sides because... (audio version included)
In some ways it is.
In some ways it is not.
In some ways it is and it is not.
In some ways it is and it is indiscernible.
In some ways it is not and it is indiscernible.
In some ways it is and is not and it is indiscernible.
- Navigating Conflict with Kazu Haga using Jainism's perspective...
[S2 Ep7 @ 22.30mins]
https://podtail.nl/podcast/finding-our-way-1/s2-ep7-navigating-conflict-with-kazu-haga/
ℹ️ indiscernible = difficult or impossible to perceive or discern (by one person especially in one moment)
What people see is not the only thing they get (many people act like life is very clearly WYSIWYG which is too simplified to be the truth...
What you see is not what you get so it's not "if I don't see it or feel it probably it's nothing / who cares / why care short term or long?" and that way literally ends up to where we are and kind of gives up the responsibility to others who want to sell it for much more and abuse it parasitically until all things die (instead of growing people AND planet).
=====================
MORE ABOUT WHY THIS IS
MORE IMPORTANT IN TECH THAN IT FIRST LOOKS ⬇️
=====================
For people who care (and maybe those more machine-minded people / Techies) it's important to see the many sidedness of things, of people, subject matters. Because many feel left out. You might also feel like you found your home but you might be moving further away from people which always isn't great long-term.
It's not just this or that, or about "efficiency" which is often mentioned almost like a kind of perfection or Indiana Jones "Holy Grail" worth dying / letting people die for.
Because anyway in humanity imperfection is baked in. Better to use it instead of go heavy expecting tech to save things (and it already has so I suggest it simply has limits and you move on to human growth more often as the 'work' like a kind of social improvement / communication as normal therapy for the rest of things).
Do continue some of what you do but WITH more people please.
Many things have many attributes which mean many feelings and perspectives to the many who see it. And care for things quite valid either way. I'm not talking about silly things but really what people care about should be considered more of a priority in reasoning.
Then there is overall the general why, the aim or overall priority with extra things but it helps to see the basics first sometimes to decide if humans are to count in the world and have 'nicer' equations to run after more than being being cut out by binary 1 or 0 choices or narrowing comparisons unfairly just because of time or even feelings that people want to cut out.
People host many things that can seem a burden but labelled as value suddenly turns the equation into something more for everyone. It may have it's limits BUT less people in community = no community and people without community almost literally die (inside and out) so if we're all too much into Tech or 1-sided viewing of life like "job" and that's it for my responsibility then diversity can be better (in moderation but again it's definitely not just job in life or needs fighting back against those that want to steal our time and use us like batteries in mono-work)
Tech and science people seem to not understand this one-sidedness (based on my conversations) and tend to want to skip this caring (call it talking) and skip the priority of building people USING people themselves!
In that mini or macro society - we need better people - NOT same-same / shitty people with tech.
Allowing for more than one truth or way-of-life to be ok is very important and several variations simply act as perspective to pehaps aappier survival or natural suffering to life we must endure but could do more friendlier... to further more good stuff to happen too- instead of trying to pipe it in a narrow medium (like text) and expect 'efficiency' to feel ok.
We'll lose everything without others...
And text is ok by the way BUT WHEN you have lots of ways and people you let people interact with you so you or they don't lose the whole human touch which is why I mention #tech #devs #science #stem being a bit stuck in the text comradeship - improving people or getting better as the fun / interaction practice (with what we love doing) is important...
I understand "no talking" type devs but society infatuated with that way and piping it through devices (and BigTech) while they and everyone else empties the eco-system, is no way of working (you will lose your machines AND ability with people and others losing their ability). It's like a super-power to keep the dust off to communicate and care and accept "imperfect humans".
Truth has many sides because...
In some ways it is.
In some ways it is not.
In some ways it is and it is not.
In some ways it is and it is indiscernible.
In some ways it is not and it is indiscernible.
In some ways it is and is not and it is indiscernible.
- Navigating Conflict with Kazu Haga using Jainism's perspective...
[S2 Ep7 @ 22.30mins]
https://podtail.nl/podcast/finding-our-way-1/s2-ep7-navigating-conflict-with-kazu-haga/
ℹ️ indiscernible = difficult or impossible to perceive or discern
Also important because often what people see is not the only thing they get (many people act like life is very clearly WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get) so "if I don't see it or feel it probably it's nothing / who cares / why care short term or long?"
=====================
MORE ABOUT WHY THIS IS
MORE IMPORTANT THAN IT
LOOKS ⬇️
=====================
For people who care (and maybe those more machine-minded people / Techies) it's important to see the many sidedness of things, of people but also of subject matters.
It's not just this or that, or just about "efficiency" because in humanity imperfection is baked in.
Many things have many attributes which mean many feelings and perspectives to the many who see it. And care in different ways quite valid. I'm not talking about silly things but really like people care.
Then there is overall why, the aim or priority with extra things but it helps to see the basics first sometimes to decide if humans are to count in the world and have 'nicer' equations to run after more than being being cut out by binary 1 or 0 choices or narrowing comparisons unfairly just because of time or even feelings that people want to cut out.
People host many things that can seem a burden but labelled as value suddenly turns the equation into something more for everyone. It may have it's limits BUT less people in community = no community and people without community almost literally die (inside and out) so if we're all too much into Tech or 1-sided viewing of life like "job" and that's it for my responsibility then diversity can be better (in moderation but again it's definitely not just job in life or needs fighting back against those that want to steal our time and use us like batteries in mono-work)
Tech and science people seem to not understand this one-sidedness (based on my conversations) and tend to want to skip this caring (call it talking) and skip the priority of building people USING people themselves!
In that mini or macro society - we need better people - NOT same-same / shitty people with tech.
Allowing for more than one truth or way-of-life to be ok is very important and several variations simply act as perspective to pehaps aappier survival or natural suffering to life we must endure but could do more friendlier... to further more good stuff to happen too- instead of trying to pipe it in a narrow medium (like text) and expect 'efficiency' to feel ok. And text is ok by the way WHEN you have lots of ways and people don't lose the whole human touch which is why I mention #tech #devs #science #stem - just whatever not improving people or getting better as the practice with what we love doing... Again I understand all heads don't and no talking devs but society infatuated with devices and playing with BigTech (while it empties the eco-system) is no way a working way (you will lose your machines AND ability with people and others losing their ability like a super-power to communicate or accept "imperfect humans")
Many-sidedness or "not 1 sidedness" is perhaps the best way to explain things to those that expect 1 answer per 1 question. Noooo it's not 1:1 always if doing with humans (as all is quite a lot about unless you lost sight of that)
It's "normal" or usual for all things to be "Difficult to perceive or discern as truth" and that's where time-investment is needed in people, in order not to lose it or head towards fascism (less caring hierarchical government 'taking care' of it's people using banks to financial force people to care using debt).
If all of us did a bit more caring we wouldn't fall so easily foul into other command-and-conquer people's hands.... (computers and science included in that).
So "Many-Sidedness" or "not only 1 sided" is perhaps the best way to remember and explain things to those that expect 1 answer per 1 question.
Noooo it's not 1:1 doing that with *humans* (quite a lot is about this allowing, unless you are loosing sight of that).
#Truth #People #Together
#STEM #Science #Binary Mediums / Mentality is where #Fascism grows
