#Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
The #relativity between people WITH State in the middle #DEFEATS BY #DESIGN the work you try to do!
Ok it keeps you alive and gets to a certain level of #education BUT then near-NOTHING after people are educated like you
So what to do next...? #Individualism
Otherwise...
All #work #energy / #Transactions 
Go to $tates (Governments designed to stress people and take more than give)
#Academics + #Tech people are slowly realizing everything piped through #state (#banks also) is #losing energy fast and even worse misdirected into worse things or robbing them!
HA HA - we need to get out of that!
So #Individuals have to gel together and form their own #state of being and not work for the un- #caring states.
If you don't get that you end up really working for the wrong people and those people just want work and #rent (and leads to #fascism / we already have it?).
Choosing individuals to work with is better long-term.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
@amerika We can't avoid being a #parasite (i.e. parasite from / on planet ultimately - Can't avoid consumption / transformation as existence can you?).
:) So TLDR is just doing it better every generation / iteration - if it's to be towards happier people (rather than opposite it seems today crushing people instead).
The key part is individuals not being against group so much more than upgrading brains or accepting how the world is more in terms of planet then people first... rather than greed or ignorance etc. Just getting better and leveraging that.
(I know you're not into that #planet and #people stuff but seems you can't avoid that being more the case than not!).
So yes feeling ok about being #parasites and just about doing it better... just more towards 🧠 / 👨🌾 more than only... 💪 / 🔫
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
My fundamental approach to the planet is something like ecofascism minus the overhead of fascism, which I think is retarded.
You have to go back to the early stuff...
https://www.amerika.org/texts/nature-is-a-bug-wrecking-factory/
In an ecosystem, we humans are not parasites; we serve a role.
Yes, consumption must occur and increases thermodynamic disorder, but we balance it with ordering.
Not sure how billions of tons of plastic landfill is necessary here, but there's probably a middle way.
Some things however are just parasitic: take everything, give nothing.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
@amerika
TALKING IN TERMS OF BASIC LAYERS
Yeah sure about plastics- but here we're not talking about the extra and aesthetic / newer stuff... just the basics of taking care of planet and people as primary more of the time and in everything we do.
ABOUT PARASITES
Interesting thing is that even parasites (of the nature world) are not or cannot be
100% parasitic: because of their existence inside an *eco-system so as long as it dies and does something it has an effect on the rest which it uses (even with just the carcass at the end or as food for others or making it's only type of 'footprints' however it moves).
So a pure-parasitic thing in nature taking everything, give nothing DOES NOT EXIST / impossible! All transforms / does things :)
E.g. People think "we could do without flies - oh they are such a 'terrible' thing" but they help pollinate and help spread so many things for the rest of the chain (good and bad for humans but main things is THEY DO SOMETHING and those tasks quite similar to bee's and they need all the support they can get or not be the only type of pollinators / air service!).
Pretty cool right? Just human parasites is the main problem to deal with. Nature not so much.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
@amerika Ok ok I see what you're saying there... not bad.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
I just want a human life where we are not actively destroying good things like nature.
"Half Earth" is a start.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
@amerika Any exact idea for the "how" or "steps" towards getting to what you said considering if people "just want a human life where we are not actively destroying good things like nature." ... WHILE knowing there are those that mostly do not want to do that (100%) and actively will be against that and what you try in any of those steps... ?
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
From reading and analysis...
* All change is change in attitudes first. Humanism is dying because a bloated, infertile, diseased, and miserable humanity is self-destructing. What comes next? Reverence, transcendence... we need those to love ourselves and nature.
* The modern time is winding down. Our miracles have expired. Thus faith in the new old ways is fading.
* Not to be unduly repetitive, but "Half Earth" -- setting aside half of land and sea for nature -- is the first step.
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
@amerika
Is that an AI powered response?
re: #Change is possible within State? (I'm not sure)
Removal of human parasites is always a good thing.
But in nature, parasites serve an important role in removing the weak.
There might be some metaphorical connection here, idk...