“Every kid starts out as a natural-born scientist, and then we beat it out of them. A few trickle through the system with their wonder and enthusiasm for science intact.”
— Carl Sagan
@Standplaats_KRK yeah… they are not shocked to hear I’m not a good plumber.
@lightweight @margreta Thanks for the exceptionally well written post.
@margreta @garyackerman I wonder if the situation I characterise here: https://davelane.nz/explainer-digitech-risks-school-boards also applies where you are... I suspect it's fairly universal, and it's a very big elephant in the room.
@margreta @ChristophB I’ve been able to deflect attempts to implement it, but interest is high in a small group of faculty I support.
A union has voted “work to rule,” so folks have been declining invitations to committee meetings. While I’m no longer in the union, I fully support the decision.
I do have to convince colleagues that suggesting, “I’ll get your input in an individual meetings” is really not an appropriate response to those who skip extra committee work as part of collective action.
Worth a read! #Edtech has changed. I’m wondering what might be abandoned.
@daltonfunbar I’m going to try to get one of my ESL colleagues to join Mastodon and connect with you.
@daltonfunbar The correct answer to your question is “it depends.” If we really want students to “know” the matetial, they must experience it from different perspectives (eg. learn computations and problem solving and framing and application and questioning and analysis… in math). There is no one strategy that will work for each as the learning is different in each. In my experience the best classrooms are the one in which teaching varies.
Director of Teaching and Learning Innovation at a community college in New England
Retired k-12 science/ math/ technology teacher/ technology integration specialist/ coordinator