Show newer

Learning leads to changes in humans. They behave differently after they have learned. They can perceive things they could not perceive before; they can state things they could not state before, they can solve things they could not solved before, and they can.

While “struggle” is a necessary component of learning, too much struggle leads to frustration which inhibits learning.

Our society will not survive the dismantling of public eduction.

A healthy relationship with ChatGPT will necessitate educators (and students, parents, policy makers, and politicians) recognize products are not evidence of learning.

The best writing teachers (at least time ones I encountered over 35 years in the field and another 17 as a student) understood the multifarious nature of writing and the many tasks that make one a good writer, so their grades were based on more than the final composition.

I came of age at a time when electronic calculators where first becoming available. Until then, “pencil and paper” was how we calculated, and even though we slogged through and found answers, we didn’t really understand math.

AI generates text with which one can generally not dispute, but it gives little clarity or insight either... for now.

"it's all inaccurate" is a sure sign it isn't.

At what point are you complicit in your employer's incompetence?

Observing is fine. Explaining is where we start tonight understand.

Libraries being described as “transgressive pleasures” is my new favorite thing.

When we are testing students (dialogistic or evaluative), we aren't teaching them.

Without search, the vast information resource we have available are useless. Generative AI is making search much more user friendly.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.