Show newer

Questions are way more interesting than answers.

“But we can show it on graphs,” is not a reason to accept data as meaningful or relevant.

Can we agree to start using “go list” and “no go list” when filtering email... or anything other than colors to differentiate what we allow and what we block?

"Curriculum or standards driven" and "Interest driven" education are mutually exclusive. A comprehensive education carves out space for "you need to learn this" & "think about these ideas" & "we support your own learning." Mashing them just makes a mess.

Don’t conflate “immediate and enthusiastic participation” with engagement in classrooms or meetings. The most deeply engaged will understand before contributing, and this requires cogitation more than participation.

Indeed, external motivations do work... but skilled faculty use them to transition to interesting problems that increase situational motivation... ideally, all students find their own motivation.

It is always interesting to see those who describe themselves as "social constructivists" who insist that all lessons/ activities/ courses have clearly stated objectives or outcomes.

"I was in the house when the house burned down....' No, Warren you missed it.

“Does it need to be accessible?”

“Yes, it does.”

No, science is not obligated to address any idea or notion that you have... even if you are in your local plurality.

Distrust those who say, “here is my great idea, now you go do it.”

“Due dates” are my suggestion for keeping on track. Work in before due date can be resubmitted, after the due date full points, but no guarantee I will be able to grade a resubmission.

What does it say about your organization if there are not qualified internal candidates?

Real experts find it very difficult to explain what they do.

What is obvious and rational to you may well be a deranged fantasy to me.

I’m not a “we tried that before” critic, but if you suggest the same thing without understanding why it failed before, then I’m unlikely to support you.

If one leaders sees your innovation as a loss, it will fail. Even if it even if it benefits all others

If your slides contain only text, you are missing the point.

It takes extra hubris to look at a problem, recognize its existence and its adverse effects, then deny it.

I’m growing tired of those who string together different or even contradictory practices in as if they have discovered the solution to our teaching g and learning problems.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.