#educators “are obsessed with perpetual evaluation of a very limited range of skills even as they ignore, even discourage, curiosity and explanation.” -Geerat Vermeij Yup that pretty much captures what is wrong with it.
Gerry’s Vetmeij wrote of evolution, “Skeptics harbor legitimate questions and reservations as well as ill informed grievances.” This describes many areas of #science. Difficulties arises what advocates cannot differentiate the two.
Purposeful, meaningful, challenging, engaging are four adjectives I see and hear applied to curriculum we should be designing. I don’t hear them applied by #students often enough. #highschool #HigherEducation #highered
It is always reassuring to get to the section of a research article in which the author discusses limitations in the study. At least #science can still be self-aware and realize articulating limitations demonstrates you know what you are doing. #research #scientists
Dunning–Kruger effect https://t.co/MFeRlVtbza This affects so much #education policy-making.
Still an interesting read:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/beautiful-minds/enough-with-the-learning-styles-already/
A blog post, now with audio:
https://hackscience.education/2018/05/16/three-choices-when-faced-with-technology/
A post for my data analytics students:
https://hackscience.education/2025/04/29/data-reports/
The author who wrote: Positive attitudinal change benefits learners, industry, society (my paraphrasing) sure seems to be ignoring the importance of defining “who defines positive?” #education #leadership
No plan is perfect. If your methods do not allow “on-the-fly” adaptations, then your interventions will fail. #leadership #LeadershipDevelopment
Director of Teaching and Learning Innovation at a community college in New England
Retired k-12 science/ math/ technology teacher/ technology integration specialist/ coordinator