Show newer

One thing I learned during 30 years as a teacher: when administration investigated itself, no wrongdoing is ever found.

“Curriculum is built on consensus.” Is it? Is it really?

I’m starting to calculate the time I waste seeing advertisements when online and it’s causing me to rethink the time I spend in the virtual world.

Let’s stop conflating using vocabulary with understanding.

Yeah… actually, I am familiar with your argument. It has been rejected by reason and data. I’m under no obligation to take it seriously.

Frameworks identify the essential aspects of a classroom—known as dimensions—that must be addressed when designing instruction. By using these tools, we can create curriculum that is both scholarly and practical.

“Rubricization… misleads people, particularly administrators, into believing that the assessment is objective and, therefore, valid.”

A technology coordinator's role is more than just building; it is about ensuring utilization. If the tools remain unutilized, the mission has failed.

Detailed research can sometimes be an impediment to classroom planning. Effective frameworks must find a balance: using language complex enough for scholars but clear enough for practitioners to guide instruction design.

Ever feel like educational theory is a world away from the classroom? There is a significant gap between scholars and practitioners. According to the sources, frameworks act as the bridge, ensuring instruction is informed by theory and vice versa.

Building a school's technology infrastructure is like tailoring a suit; if the tailor follows the initial measurements but ignores the client's feedback during the fitting, the final product will sit in the closet regardless of how well the seams are sewn.

It is not just about what educators think they need at the start. It is about discovering the right solution through ongoing dialogue and flexibility.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) allows an attacker to run their own JavaScript in a victim's browser, potentially stealing session cookies or compromising the machine.

Ever heard an IT coordinator say, "I built what they asked for, it’s not my problem"? This attitude leads to underutilized technology that fails to support educators.

Wasted money and staff time are the consequences of tech systems that don't fit the classroom. IT leaders must take ownership of the final outcome.

IT professionals must commit to the final product. Ensuring the system is what teachers actually need—not just what they initially requested—is an essential skill.

School IT leaders, take note: Building exactly what you're told isn’t enough. If the system goes unused, the investment in devices and software is wasted.

“Wealth is spread through knowledge and cooperation.”

This des not bode well for US right now.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.