Show newer

What if students actively access their learning and do not believe the test results?

Maybe students frame complex problems and solve them (or attempt to solve them) rather than only learning about the problems.

When I started with computers (1982 or so), they told me GIGO. Recent observation suggests it’s still true.

It’s unfortunate that so many leaders never question their IT folks. I get why you don’t, but it is terrifically irresponsible.

“I will rejoice in the multifariousness of nature and leave the chimera of certainty to politicians and preachers.”
― Stephen Jay Gould

Years ago, I realized all judgements of my abilities to teach were going to be grounded in how my students performed on a single test. My job search began immediately.

“I’d prefer it to be true” is not evidence.

Teleological language when describing natural selection annoys me. It is so inaccurate and gives folks a false sense of how it works.

We expect politicians to argue against straw men. When folks posing at academics do it, it is troubling.

“Everything is a technology.” Really? Many things can be applied to human purposes, but that doesn’t make them all technology.

Here is your reminder that technology you find comfortable may not be effective.

Substantive questions belong in the curriculum.

What happens when learning outside the classroom becomes more relevant to students?

Curriculum intended to teach everyone everything is too broad to teach anything.

Hey school leaders... if your IT folks don't give special ed teachers, nurses, and other who deal with very sensitive data their own printers/ scanners/ copiers you need to make them. If you can't make them, you need to replace them.

Hey IT... let's not limit what people can do because it is easier for us to mange simple tools.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.