Show newer

@garyackerman Sometimes we have the solutions before we have the problems... and that's surprisingly difficult to deal with.

The "extended mind" theory suggests our cognitive processes aren't just in our heads. Technology like a smartphone can become part of our mind. This means interfering with a device could be morally equivalent to interfering with a person.

Neurotechnologies can threaten personal autonomy. Algorithms that learn your preferences can influence your decisions in ways you may not realize, constituting an "undue influence". This is especially concerning when corporate interests are involved.

Calling your “fill in the facts” worksheets a “scaffold for big ideas” isn’t really what we mean.

It is more accurate to say “state the opinions upon which you base your facts.”

I like protocols, but I see them as scaffolds. If you are not integrating the interaction into your practice, you are missing the point.

Education is a field in which leaders firmly believe what they did decades ago is the answer to today’s problems.

“We are adopting a new textbook, it’s going to vastly improve the course for our students.”

Is it? Is it really?

Perceptions matter... but sometimes they are inaccurate.

Cognitive presence... which is (basically) becoming curious, exploring and integrating new concepts and ideas, then "owning" new learning... if your classroom doesn't nurture this, then... well... it should.

Discovery. Exploration.

These teaching strategies are informed and guided in a way instructionists ignore.

Instruction can be engaging in a way discovery educators ignore.

Open pedagogy-- finds students becoming prosumers of knowledge. This is a threat to many.

Users: Why don’t we just make a web site to do x?

IT: Yeah, maintaining a web site is hard and time consuming.

Users: It can’t be that hard, can’t you set it up so we can do it?

IT: Sure, here you go.

Users: We don’t have time for this. Who builds and updates our pages?

One thing I learned during 30 years as a teacher: the language in faculty lounges is worse than in football locker rooms.

Students want a purpose to the lesson… not measurable outcomes… but a purpose.

Who knew?

I mean other than all the students and most of the teachers.

Self-reported data is fine… but it’s not always what you need.

Calling your “fill in the facts” worksheets a “scaffold for big ideas” isn’t really what we mean.

“We have a new paradigm.”

“No, actually you just found an alliterative way to summarize what is obvious.”

Hey leaders admit it…

You hear complaints about IT, but you have no idea how to address it.

Our technology decisions are made, in part, by social influences—we want what others are using.

Unfortunately, influential folks often adopt lousy IT.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.