Show newer

“What do you think?”

It’s ok to answer, “I don’t know enough to have formed an opinion.”

When you insist the meetings you lead be in-person only, you demonstrate you are not dedicated to inclusion, not matter what you claim about yourself.

There continues to be so many educators who conflate quite with attentive.

If you are talking about “ascertaining truths” you are not doing science.

I’ve been introduced to “influencers in the wild” lately. Is this really why we have the internet?

Rationalizing isn’t substantiating.

Well at least rational folks see the difference.

The state has a “compelling interest” in teaching? (What subjects answer the question?)

Reading a book about a 1980’s attempt to teach “creation science” and thus question arose.

“We need to do this thing in schools.”

Yeah… there’s no evidence it helps.

“All the more reason!”

X. Twitter. Whatever it’s called, I’m not going to pay to use it.

I can’t imagine being so afraid of being wrong that I would not change my mind.

One way to be sure I’ll never vote for you is aligning yourself with those who want to ban books.

Is using a new platform to do the same thing innovative? My answer is “no.”

Getting on a plane for the first time since Feb 2020.

Should teachers abandon the presentations that accompany their textbooks in favor of those created by AI?

“We’ll get to it as soon as I tell them all the basics they need” contains a condition that is never met.

In my experience, lectures can be made more interesting and interactive, yet they rarely are.

Hey IT: if falls say your system is rotten then it is.

“People don’t trust x” and “x isn’t accurate” are not the same.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.