Gary Ackerman @garyackerman@qoto.org

Great data. How do you know it isn't regression to the mean?

So much instruction ignores what we know about brains.

Humans do not pay attention to boring things. No matter how important teachers say they are.

Occam's razor applies to technology tools as well. "When faced with a choice, select the more simple tool."

One cannot build sophisticated knowledge unless one has sophisticated knowledge. Teachers--good teachers--give students experiences that lead to it.

Effective teachers create rich context and social interaction in their classrooms.

If you have never been in front of a classroom full of students waiting for you to fix the projector, then they are not qualified to be a school technology leader.

The technology you have may not be the technology you need, but it is the technology you will be told is what you need.

I recently found the picture I took at a "new school year kickoff" a few years back. The principal shared a slide with the 12 initiatives they had underway. the acronyms made a letter salad on the screen.

There is plenty wrong with education, but "it's not it was" is not one of them,.

Just because it is what you experienced, does not mean it is better.

If you find it in an obscure place on the internet, your should assume it is incorrect.

I read more books now when I listen to them while walking that when I look at printed pages. I really enjoy both, and do both as often as I can, but I do not differentiate the expereinces as "reading" and "not reading."

Banning a technology rarely results in in being unused.

Schools are perpetually in a state of horizontal reform. They are always beginning new practices, and none is ever allowed to have deep influences on pedagogy and student experiences.

"We have changed your freemium account to a free trial" is probably not going to convince a long-time users of the freemium account.

When it comes to school policy: "The politically powerful appear to be those who are the least aware of the nature of human learning." I think I was correct 10 years ago.

I checked on on the train wreck on that is now twitter and found that after 6 weeks of inactivity, I seem to have added 200 followers (at least I recall having 200 fewer followers 6 week sago, when iI quit posting). Its almost like those followers are bots.

"Rich in rhetoric, but fundamentally bankrupt" is the most appropriate description of #edreform I have ever read.

It amazes me when IT folks try to BS me. Then they get ticked off when I call them on it.