Folks new to education often comment on the degree who which existing systems or expertise are rejected. Schools build systems, don't use them, then replace them with new systems to do the same thing... which are subsequently unused.
We used to store computer files on disks kept in boxes next to the machines... or in our backpacks. Hackers did not get the data often, but neither did we if we were physically distant from them.
“Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge: it is those who know little, not those who know much, who so positively assert that this or that problem will never be solved by science.” ― Charles Darwin
Before scientists accept an observation, it must be observed by others. If you call yourself "data-driven" then others (who don't care what you think) must concur with your observations and interpretations.
In science, observation is supreme. All disputes are resolved by evidence and observation, and evidence and observation must follow the rules of logic.
I heard a student on a panel of students who were talking to educators who said "don't flex on us" talking about the power dynamics in schools. All of the students were articulate and told the educators what they needed to hear, but that phrase captured it perfectly!
Whereas my high school had a small computer room for students to use (I recall four computers in the room), my first teaching job was in a school with multiple computer rooms.