Show newer

Was Moore's Law a prediction of a target rather than an observation?

"The best way to invent the future is to predict it--if you can get enough people to believe in your prediction, that is." -John Perry Barlow

(is the creation), (its improvement), (its spread throughout users). To completely understand and its influence, all three are essential.

The machine cannot be divorced from its larger social pattern; for it is this pattern that gives it meaning and purpose." - Lewis Mumford

I'm always confused when I herd politicians who have been in office a long time decide now to "fix the longstanding problems."

I tweeted this in 2018. It may be more accurate than I thought:
We assume (falsely) that and it’s advance is rational and can be controlled by humans.

Humans are social animals. The culture in which we live influences what and how we learn.

While we attend to novelty, humans tend to surround themselves with familiar “things.”

Yeah... I was unpopular in several situations where I pointed out the learning styles myth. Started carrying extra copies of some of the best “debunking” articles.

When you are a in a where the are having petty power struggles, it is obvious... and uncomfortable... and sad.

When you sit in a where the doesn’t know ’ names, it is obvious... and uncomfortable... and sad.

Quickly adopting the solution someone else uses almost always assures you will not be satisfied with the results... your situation differs in unknown ways. Sometime one must reinvent the wheel.

T. H. Huxley wrote, “battles, like hypotheses, are not to be multiplied beyond necessity.”

If you can explain everything, you can explain nothing.

Most impediments to scientific understanding are conceptual, not factual lacks. Most difficult to dislodge are those biases that escape our scrutiny because they seem so obviously, even ineluctably, just. - Stephen Jay Gould

IMO: , , is given only cursory role (despite the rhetoric) in . Without having a habit of mind to doubt our data, we cannot know when we are deceiving ourselves.

“We live in a profoundly nonintellectual culture, made all the worse by a passive hedonism abetted by the spread of wealth and its dissipation into countless electronic devices that impart the latest in entertainment and supposed information....” Gould had that correct!

We are bombarded with too much [information] in our inordinately complex world; if we cannot sort the trivial from the profound, we are lost in terminal overload. -Stephen Jay Gould

Stasis is the norm for complex systems; change, when provoked at all, is usually rapid and episodic. -Stephen Jay Gould

Yeah, so the Earth may (surely will) survive human hubris... humans, not so much. from

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.