Show newer

If you are a talking about “how students can learn the information they need,” then you need to stop. Students don’t need information... they need application, connection, to learn how to learn, expertise, ability to frame and analyze and solve problems, etc.

Just because you can do it doesn’t mean you should do it. That’s what ethics are all about.

Yeah... so... if your strategy “makes learning easier,” I’m going to be skeptical... very skeptical... you seem to misunderstand learning.

When cognition evolved, humans became capable of “thinking their way through” unfamiliar situations. I wonder why schools now treat “the standards” as capturing every possible exigency.

Understanding is grounded in knowing how you are wrong.

Wicked problems are interconnected. Each can be both a cause and an effect of others, complicating understanding and solution design. Solutions might even cause unacceptable problems for others.

For wicked problems, every solution matters. Planners don't get to test like scientists/engineers. Solutions have permanent effects on people. Problem solvers have no right to be wrong and must implement the best possible solution.

There is no stopping rule for solving wicked problems. Even if conditions are met, uncertainty remains. Solutions can be deemed sufficient for now, but refinements are always possible as conditions change.

"We express empathy and sympathy and disgust. We learn to sense others’ state of mind and to communicate (and sometimes deceive others about) our state of mind."

So, I’m an atheist. If you are paying to have “join my church” messages appear in my social media feeds, you are wasting your money.

"Human babies are born too small to support even the basic movements necessary for independent life until months after birth, and we are dependent on adults for years. During these years, we learn. We learn a lot."

Unlike tame problems which are definable, understandable, and consensual, wicked problems are ill-defined, not completely definable, and lack agreement on their existence or resolution.

Even if the mythological learning styles are marginal to your argument, I am skeptical of the whole thing.

I try to adopt Richard Feynman’s view, “the world us much more interesting if you don’t know.”

Competence is one’s capacity to perform. Competencies are one’s perceptions of their competence. These may not be the same.

We adopt tools. We adapt our work to leverage the capacity if the tools we adopt. We exapt novel and unintended uses of tools.

Computers remember what they count and count what the remember.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.