My university is owned and operated by the US government, and I'm a govt employee. This means that all my research papers where I'm corresponding author are "US government work", and are in the public domain (according to US law). This means that I CAN'T grant scummy publishers the copyright for my work. Anyone can post it where ever they want since it's in the public domain.
This is an unexpectedly awesome perk of my job. I exist in the corner case of US copyright law that allows academic papers to be distributed as they should be.
@natematias @mako at least Wikipedia is a nonprofit with an open license, so there is a reasonable understanding that contributors are giving their time and effort truly for the commons. Openstreetmaps is similar. I do not do unpaid volunteer work for for-profit companies. There is a history of privatizing volunteer work and data; the first time I was conscious of this happening was with CDDB, which seems almost quaint now: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/05/outliving-outrage-public-interest-internet-cddb-story
**rubs forehead and mutters to self**: as if we don't have enough problems:
"the choice to burn up satellites in the atmosphere may pose a significant risk to the Earth’s climate and the ozone layer, through the resulting alteration of atmospheric chemistry. . . . with a typical satellite weighing of order 1,000 kg [2,200 lb], and being primarily metallic, the steady state injection of metals into the stratosphere by vaporization of satellites would be at least 8,000 tons per year."
https://buttondown.com/creativegood/archive/musks-space-junk-is-a-threat-to-us-all/
#space #SpaceJunk #starlink #climate #environment #pollution #garbage #trash #nature #air
laptop recommendations
Wow, Framework laptops look awesome!! Thank you for the multiple recommendations, Fediverse! I'll look at this more tomorrow when I (hopefully?) recover from decision fatigue.
Site blocking means the right to choose what websites you visit would be taken away from you and given to giant media companies and ISPs. And the very shape of the internet would have to be changed to allow it. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/04/mpa-doesnt-get-decide-who-first-amendment-protects
Mastodon isn't perfect.
But the fact a social network exists that is completely free to use
has no venture capital investors
has no shareholders to answer to
has no growth targets
with a web interface with zero tracking cookies
and mobile apps with zero trackers at all
with ten thousand server administrators who donate their time for user safety
is - in my opinion - mindbogglingly cool, given the state of the world we live in. Not everything has to be shit. People make things better.
Michael Gottlieb (@feynmanlectures), editor of the new edition of the Feynman lectures, has written a letter strongly disagreeing with some things Collier says in her video. You can see it here:
I was not implicitly endorsing all of @acollierastro's claims in my first post. I merely said what I wanted to say.
Nor am I implicitly endorsing Gottlieb's claims here. I hope Gottlieb and Collier can discuss this without using me as an intermediary.
(2/2)
@TonyVladusich @shuttersparks @dougmerritt - thanks! My uncle was a physics teacher, and he gave me the Feynman Lectures, so I've wanted to explain physics since I was a kid, and I had some good role models. But if I'm good at explaining stuff, it probably also helped that I had a teaching job for 35 years, and my main hobby is explaining math and physics online. I practice every day.
Explaining calculus to freshmen who are forced to take the course is much harder than explaining black holes to an interested audience online! I was probably pretty bad at teaching for the first 5 or 10 years. One of my first teaching evaluations simply said "Fire him." But I really wanted to get good.
And that seems to be how it works with everything. I can't find it now, but there's an article I really like that explained the differences between Olympic-level swimmers and the second and third tier of swimmers. And one difference is that the best swimmers really enjoy doing all the exercises and drills that lesser swimmers find boring... probably because they are not just idly repeating the drill, but thinking all the time about how to improve.
TL;DR: They tested the genome of all the bat viruses that were in the Wuhan labs in 2021 and found that none are related to the Covid-19 one. Meaning that we have one more proof that Covid-19 did not "escape from a lab".
(I assume the link is paywalled but can't check now)
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03982-2
Ever wonder why @pixelfed doesn't have a spam problem?
- We prevent new users from sending DMs
- We built an automated spam detection service that can email you when spam is detected, and you can make the final decision
We have even more in store 🚀
Beech parquet flooring? Or solid pine? Limestone counter tops? Or stainless steel? Architecture firm Henning Larsen has published an open-source catalogue of the carbon impacts of interior products. Download “Unboxing Carbon” at https://henninglarsen.com/publications #ClimateAction
In some previous posts, I’ve been chipping away at the question of how two objects falling into a black hole appear from each other’s vantage, and now I’ve put all the pieces together to answer a question @johncarlosbaez posed on his blog:
If a fleet of spaceships all fall into a black hole from different starting points along the same radial line, how would the other ships appear to one in the middle of the fleet?
https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2024/11/30/black-hole-puzzle/
The plot here shows the “apparent distance” of the other ships (as determined by the angle each ship subtends, if you know its size, or by its parallax if you view it from slightly different positions). It also shows where the ships were located, when the light now being received from them was emitted.
The details are quite different depending on whether we’re seeing a ship that is closer to the black hole than us, by means of “outgoing light” — light moving away from the hole — versus a ship further from the hole that we see by “incoming light”.
Because the event horizon itself is formed by the paths through spacetime traced by outgoing light rays, we see all the ships closer to the hole than us cross the event horizon just as we cross it ourself.
But the incoming light from ships that are further from the hole than us reaches us later, for any given r coordinate where it was emitted, and we hit the singularity at the centre of the hole before we see any light emitted from those ships when they crossed the horizon.
EDITED TO ADD: This diagram has some mistakes. I’ve given a correct version in a reply.
When I read about these things I always think about some of the writing of @pluralistic on graceful failure modes. A product (system) is not defined by its success but by how good or poorly it fails. I've been teaching students that not considering (poor) failure modes is a huge liability.
It really frustrates me that most banks and credit card sites have either no #2FA or only offer SMS-based 2FA. Do people know of banks that offer 2FA via TOTP,/authenticator app, passkey, or hardware #authenticator (e.g. #Yubikey)? The only US financial sites I've seen claim this are Bank of America, Vanguard, USAA, and Schwab. (For the purposes of this discussion, I'm excluding crypto-related sites.)
Tomorrow is my last lecture for both my astro courses. I always end my astronomy classes with The Pale Blue Dot speech, and I'll be pretty impressed with myself if I manage to get through it without crying tomorrow. It seems to get even harder every year. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GO5FwsblpT8
"There is no better demonstration of the folly of human conceits than this distant image...it underscores our responsibility to deal more kindly with one another, and to preserve and cherish the Pale Blue Dot."
FBI releases PSA warning about all the ways that cybercriminals are using AI to commit fraud on a larger scale and to increase the success of their scams. The advisory warns about deepfaked videos and voice calls, as well as AI generated profile images to impersonate people.
Among their recommendations:
-Create a secret word or phrase with your family to verify their identity.
-Look for subtle imperfections in images and videos, such as distorted hands or feet, unrealistic teeth or eyes, indistinct or irregular faces, unrealistic accessories such as glasses or jewelry, inaccurate shadows, watermarks, lag time, voice matching, and unrealistic movements.
-Listen closely to the tone and word choice to distinguish between a legitimate phone call from a loved one and an AI-generated vocal cloning.
-If possible, limit online content of your image or voice, make social media accounts private, and limit followers to people you know to minimize fraudsters' capabilities to use generative AI software to create fraudulent identities for social engineering.
-Verify the identity of the person calling you by hanging up the phone, researching the contact of the bank or organization purporting to call you, and call the phone number directly.
-Never share sensitive information with people you have met only online or over the phone.
-Do not send money, gift cards, cryptocurrency, or other assets to people you do not know or have met only online or over the phone.
Theoretical physicist by training (PhD in quantum open systems/quantum information), University lecturer for a bit, and currently paying the bills as an engineer working in optical communication (implementation) and quantum communication (concepts), though still pursuing a little science on the side. I'm interested in physics and math, of course, but I enjoy learning about really any area of science, philosophy, and many other academic areas as well. My biggest other interest is hiking and generally being out in nature.