Show newer

Wordle 709 3/6*

🟨⬛⬛⬛🟩
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 708 3/6*

🟩⬛⬛⬛⬛
🟩🟨⬛⬛🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 707 4/6*

⬛⬛🟨🟨🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟨
🟩🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 706 4/6*

🟩⬛⬛⬛🟩
🟩⬛🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 705 5/6*

⬛⬛🟨⬛🟨
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
⬛🟩⬛🟩⬛
🟨🟩⬛🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 704 4/6*

⬛🟩⬛🟨🟨
⬛🟩⬛🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 703 4/6*

⬛⬛⬛🟩🟨
⬛🟨⬛🟩⬛
⬛⬛🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 702 5/6*

⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛🟨⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟨🟨⬛
⬛🟨⬛🟨⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Not my finest hour.

Maybe instead of getting ChatGPT or another AI to write for you, maybe just say what you want to see in a short, concise way, such as a bulleted list. If what you write can be replicated by an AI, chances are that it's really not worth all that verbage.

Wordle 701 3/6*

🟨⬛🟩🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 700 3/6*

🟨⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 699 4/6*

⬛⬛⬛🟨🟨
⬛🟨⬛🟩🟨
🟨🟩🟩🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 698 3/6*

🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩⬛⬛🟩⬛
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 697 5/6*

⬛⬛🟩⬛⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟨⬛
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
⬛🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

@lauxmyth @Radical_EgoCom@kolektiva.social Yes. That's what I said.

Wordle 696 2/6*

⬛🟨🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Wordle 695 3/6*

⬛⬛🟨⬛🟩
🟨⬛🟨⬛🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

@lauxmyth @Radical_EgoCom@kolektiva.social I don't deny the obvious disparity. The homeless guy's act was a clearly defined crime with a minimum three year sentence. He went through all the motions of robbing a bank, including terrorising a bank teller into handing over cash, even if he only took a single note. He could just as easily (and justifiably) been shot by security or the police.

The corporate aided and abetted an existing fraud, and got a plea deal by cooperating with investigators. Yes, it's still a crime, but a non-violent one. Lots of factors reduce the sentence.

Is it fair? Each case has to be taken on its own merits. In the homeless guy's case, he committed a very real offence, even if he wasn't serious. A terrible error of judgement. Should the judge have been lenient? On the surface, yes (not gone up to 15 years from the minimum 3 etc), but who knows what other factors there were.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.