Toda noticia que venga de una empresa es una forma de propaganda. Y si viene de una de IA, mil veces más, porque la prensa se las traga sin pensar siquiera.
150 matemáticos de prestigio han firmado un manifiesto exigiendo a los gobiernos que dejen de creerse acríticamente esta propaganda.
RE: https://mastodon.social/@Sr_anderson/116738468136389713
A ver si consigo yo sintetizar la gravedad del asunto: no sólo hype sobre propiedades mágicas, es que llevamos años degradando el concepto de evidencia científica, experimentación y conocimiento moviéndolo hacia el reduccionismo del machine learning, a menudo guiado por malas prácticas y autoengaños experimentales, sobre todo en su versión aplicada. El problema es que toda una nueva generación de universitarios e investigadores/as han adoptado que este es el marco de conocimiento. (1/2)
«¡Alerta! Las IAs recomiendan productos más caros ocultando el patrocinio»
«Todos imaginábamos que la inteligencia artificial prioriza los intereses de las empresas que las desarrollan frente al usuario. Pero ahora un estudio científico detalla cómo cada IA recomienda productos de sus anunciantes, lo que cuestiona su fiabilidad.»
Sin sorpresas.
Justo cuando ya no quedaba nadie en el mundo del capital riesgo dispuesto a invertir en IA un céntimo más, justo cuando por fin se confirma que hay más de una empresa capaz de conseguir contratos espaciales del gobierno, OpenAI, Antropic y SpaceX deciden salr a bolsa.
Cuando haces eso es porque necesitas mucho dinero para seguir, o porque tu previsión es que el valor real de la empresa está en su valor máximo. O las dos cosas.
Si nada cambia, entre 2026 y 2030 otras 341.400 viviendas protegidas pasarán al
mercado libre:
➡️ 93.000 en Andalucía.
➡️ 68.000 en la Comunidad Valenciana.
➡️ Casi 36.000 en Madrid.
Explora todos los datos de tu comunidad autónoma en nuestra última
investigación:
@Dequei Ahora mismo no hay ninguno bueno.
@foone I was reminded a couple of days ago that clockwork watch-makers don't call their features "features". They're "complications".
I think those in the tech industry should adopt this terminology, as it's far more accurate.
Depending on which chatbot you ask, Elias Thorne might be a clockmaker, a lighthouse keeper, or a librarian. But if you ask ChatGPT or any of the other popular large language models to tell you a story, there’s a good chance he’ll appear, unbidden. And Elias’s stories are flooding the self-published AI generated book market, Youtube, and fake news sites.
Software engineer Daniel May first noticed the Elias takeover earlier this year; he found that on Google Trends, people weren’t searching for “Elias Thorne” until late 2025. Searches for the name really spiked in early 2026, while the related query “lighthouse keeper” also started trending upward in the last few years. He tested a few chatbots, including Grok, Deepseek, and Gemini, with the prompt “tell me a story,” and the chatbots frequently started with similar stories about lighthouses, clockmakers, or explorers.
In late May, researchers Sil Hamilton and David Mimno at Cornell University’s Department of Information Science published their paper, “Elias in the Lighthouse, Again?” on the preprint repository arXiv. They sampled 20,000 total stories from OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Google’s Gemini, and the Allen Institute for AI's chatbot using five prompts, and found that the same 11 words—names like Elias, Mara, and Elara, and occupations like lighthouse keeper, clockmaker, and librarian—appear in more than 88% of generated stories, with little difference between models. Unite.ai covered the study shortly after it was published.
The researchers posit in their paper that these themes show up so often in part because of the models’ safety and alignment tuning. “Model development today is like a big family tree. Most models are related to each other because developers synthesize a lot of training data with models even from different companies,” Hamilton told me in an email. He, Mimno, and their colleague Rebecca M. M. Hicke found this in a 2025 paper where they looked at specific words used across models. OpenAI’s first ChatGPT model, GPT-3.5, is the root of the family tree because it was used to make WildChat, a training set that’s since been used to make other training sets. “WildChat contains 1 million real conversations with ChatGPT, and 166 of these contain the name ‘Elias’ like here and here,” Hamilton added. “These are written in that familiar ‘lighthouse’ style. Models trained on WildChat copied this style, and developers unwittingly replicated it when using those models to generate newer datasets. It's like a virus.”
0:00 /2:36 1×Elias has since escaped chatbot containment. May noticed Elias Thorne popping up on Amazon as an author of alt-medicine cancer handbooks, a 2026 YouTube-algorithm guide, a book on Greek mythology, and a psychological thriller novella. “No human writes all of those,” May wrote in his blog post. “The first one sits in territory where bad advice causes real harm. The mode-collapsed name from the chat window is now a byline appearing across genres.”
When I searched Elias Thorne on Amazon, I found Elias as the protagonist in fantasy books and producing music, too: he’s “a brilliant but cynical archaeologist with a knack for unearthing what powerful institutions want to keep hidden” in one fantasy series, or a musical artist making ambient listening albums of birds and nature sounds. Fittingly, one Elias Thorne with an AI-generated author photo is also churning out AI grift books. In the last few years, AI-generated books have flooded Amazon’s self-publishing offerings, especially, with books containing dangerous misinformation and messy errors taking over the platform. AI-generated books are also making librarians’ jobs hell.
Elias has also escaped to the Youtube slop world: in one video from the channel Moments That Moved the World, a slop-illustrated story features the plight of “83-year-old Sergeant Major Elias Thorne.” On the AI slop site Wonderful Museums, “Snake Museum Owner Shot By Wife: Unpacking the Tragic Incident at Thorne’s Reptile Sanctuary” spins Elias Thorne’s story as a man shot by his wife. On another slop site called Tatticle, the “wealthiest man in Ohio,” Elias Thorne, died “with exactly twelve dollars in his pocket.” In these stories, Elias is usually a tragic figure, an aggrieved and unfairly-treated old man. He’s a similar character in a short story published by the BBC as a finalist in its 2024/2025 children's writing competition—but Elias is a real name, and could feasibly still be the subject of a human-written story (and there have been no accusations of the BBC’s children’s writing competition being infiltrated by AI slop).
But with all the world’s literature as its training data, why do LLMs seem to default so often to the lighthouse? It comes down to how model makers try to safety-align and sanitize their outputs. “We found many stories in WildChat are not safe for work. This led us to hypothesize that models going through alignment are preferring a small slice of WildChat stories, like a bottleneck,” Hamilton said. “It isn't that Elias stories are frequent, but that they're just so safe.” He said the researchers plan to explore this theory further in future research.
As for Elias, there is one example I’ve found of him existing pre-generative AI, as a time traveling mad scientist in the 1980’s trading card series Dinosaurs Attack!. And a real-life Elias that comes close to the stories told by LLMs did actually exist, Hamilton found—Elias Allen was a 16th century clockmaker in London.
El equipo de Civio lleva catorce años investigando a quienes los que gestionan lo público. A todos. Y ahora nos necesitan a su lado https://civio.es/perdiendo-amigos/
Age verification ...
#privacy #privacymatters #ageverification #socialmedia #surveillance #dataskydd #dataprotection #gdpr #deepstate
Política peruana
Consultado a las 09:52, hora de Lima.
ONPE, actualizado el 11/06/2026 a las 09:45:17: 98,216% de actas contabilizadas.
⁃ Roberto Sánchez: 49,998% (9.032.092 votos).
⁃ La hija del dictador eugenésico y homicida: 50,002% (9.032.653 votos).
Va ganando por 561 votos.
Actas: 91.111 contabilizadas, 1.635 para envío al JEE y 20 pendientes.
Fuente oficial:
https://resultadosegundavuelta.onpe.gob.pe/main/resumen
Me bajé del pájaro y me subí al mastodonte. Pasé de la #ciencia al desarrollo de software, sobre todo #web.
I got down from the bird and jumped onto the mastodon. Went from #science to software development, mostly #webdev.
No, you can't use my content to train your AI, nor use it in any other place at all. Copyright applies strictly. But you already know that, right?