Martin Ruskov @mapto@qoto.org

@LaureM @rbreich I'm afraid that even documented, it'd need to use different channels to get to the relevant audience

@triptych the day after: company stocks rise sharply.

I personally don't care if that company will struggle financially after that or have to hire again in 6 months.

I'd like to see that these people become less dependent on individual employers as a consequence. Almost certainly, 6-figure salaries would not part of such a development, but I fail to see this as such a dramatic problem.

@mastodonmigration @KathyReid to the ignorant that I am, this sounds legally feasible, but economically challenging. That's a lot of content and maintaining it on a live platform is associated with notable costs. Not a reason to stop someone from trying, rather an argument to plan ahead.

Here's a starting point: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/stackoverflow/stackoverflow

@j3j5 @blogdiva @KathyReid this appears to be only an opinion, which 1) doesn't appear very informed to me, and 2) only mentions code-related issues, and does not address them.

More precisely, clearly when talking of code, this is not part of the process used:
"Diffusion models like Stable Diffusion and Midjourney take these inputs, add “noise” to them, corrupting them, and then train neural networks to remove the corruption."
Neither is this:
"This is because using the digitized books as part of the database provided information about the books and did not use them for their creative content"

Also, regarding the court's inverse question, it seems to me that this is an extremely valid concern:
"On this point, the court wrote that the better question to answer was not how much of the works [company] copied, but instead how much was available to users". Due to the granularity of SO, this could easily be 100%, even though this would need to be illustrated (=proven) as in the NYT case.

Could anyone identify "substantial, non infringing uses" of the SO data? Here using CC might make it difficult to establish what was the original interest of the contributor.

Final note, to me it remains a bit unclear what is the relevance of the Oracle Vs Google case according to the author.

@RossGayler @Heterokromia @cogsci to me it seems you need to be more clear on your requirements. Are your non-negative and multidimensional requirements independent, as far as you can tell?

If so, a multidimensional (do you know how many dimensions/animals you have?) modulo space sounds a viable solution. That'd be something denoted as https://www.HostMath.com/Show.aspx?Code=%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D_k%5En , with k being the cardinality of one dimension (would they need to have different cardinalities?), and n being the number of dimensions.

@tambou qua ci sono anche cose non svizzere: https://fedi.directory/

Are ground movements in Naples a sign of a nearing volcano eruption?

@glennf @franktaber@mas.to that's the key: low expectations can get you excited even about mediocre performance

@axios by the time they even start building, the bubble will burst

What options do these people have? #WestBank #Palestine
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ah-0ikNr8o0

@bojacobs at the same time it is insightful to see exactly what is out there. I have particular respect for science that validates the obvious. On one hand it's a low-hanging fruit, on another it's way too banal for many people to actually engage with it. And yet, there's lots to be understood even there.

@bojacobs Not sure this sounds very convincing to me as an ignorant person. Why should e.g. complex consonants be delivered from Eurasia, rather than developed in parallel locally? Would that be such a rare possibility?

@ajn142 @thomasfuchs actually, I do believe you can remix models that are openly shared (at least through fine-tuning).

But anything closed that uses SO (e.g. Google BigQuery), might probably be an infringement.
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=public+dataset+containing+stackoverflow&t=fpas&ia=web

Fear, cynicism, nihilism, and apathy... is what modern autocrats sell

"Fear, cynicism, nihilism, and apathy, coupled with disgust and disdain for democracy: This is what modern autocrats sell to their citizens and to foreigners, all with the aim of destroying what they call “American hegemony.”"

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/06/china-russia-republican-party-relations/678271/

@globalpolitics