love the idea that the and code are fundamentally the same thing. Since of course are (not always , but that's another post) they think this is proof that life was too.

They seize on one-liners from those they regard as infidels and heretics, because then they can say, "See? Even unbelievers admit that ..." Bill Gates and Richard Dawkins, both known for going outside their lanes, are popular choices. Gates: " is like a computer program but far, far more advanced than any software ever created." Dawkins: "I'm fascinated by the idea that genetics is digital. A is a long sequence of coded letters, like computer information."

I get why this is a popular analogy. Unfortunately, it's also a bad one. Those of us with one foot in each field know the differences far outweigh the similarities. Which leads me to the following epigram:

Many say genes look like code. Many say code looks like genes. No says either.

Since pardoned every member of the mob, 33 out of the approximately 1,500 released have been convicted of other , a rate of 2.2%.

Elsenet, sumdood is arguing that this is no big deal because, and I quote, "The national violent crime rate is 4.4%." He argues that therefore, J6ers are less violent than the average person. Unfortunately for him (but fortunately for everyone else!) he's not even close.

There were about 1.3 million violent crimes *reported* in the US last year, out of a population of about 330 million. Assuming one criminal and one victim per crime—which isn't necessarily the case, of course, but it's a reasonable approximation—that's a rate of 0.4%, not 4% or more.

The and rates are much lower. There are about 500,000 violent crime arrests each year, or 0.15%. I can't find conviction numbers at the moment, but they must be lower than arrest numbers: for convenience, let's say 0.10% of the population, 2/3 of those arrested, are convicted.

2.2% is a lot more than 0.10%. Even a ought to be able to figure that out.

So many things to be angry about. I need to triage. "Okay, the shithead in exam room 8 will probably be admitted to a jerk ward, but the fuckface in trauma bed 3 is definitely going to the ICU [idiot care unit], and someone prep the asshat we parked out in the hallway for a cephalanalectomy ..."

Dipping my toe in the waters of prediction:

I will be very surprised if there is not a large, open ground presence in in the next six months, if not sooner. Maybe a significant presence too, but that will be quieter, a la the in .

The funny thing is, there's a way we probably *could* install a government that would be popular enough to survive with just US support rather than bleeding out in the jungle—namely, back and give her whatever she needs to consolidate power. But is too angry about a woman getting the he so clearly deserved for that ever to happen. Not to mention his crew of chest-and-Bible-thumpers who don't want to see any woman in charge of any country, ever.

So instead we'll end up keeping most of 's machinery of dictatorship in place, and supporting it against an ever-growing resistance armed with Chinese weaponry. "Advisers" in 3 ... 2 ... 1 ...

Tell the DJ to put Fortunate Son on repeat.

I just opened a feature request on that got assigned issue number 404. Hopefully someone will see it even so!

The idea that the of at war should be off-limits is a relic of the days when and noble expected to be treated respectfully by their counterparts on the other side while they all cheerfully trampled into the mud. Let it and them die.

Another addendum: like many writers, I'm a bit of a when it comes to the writing process. After decades of messing around with various word processors, these days I do my writing in using a text editor, then convert it to Word for sharing it with the rest of the world. I'm genuinely happier that way. checkers and the like can fuck right off.

But I'm uneasy with people who create rejecting the *idea* that might be useful for endeavors. I don't yet know what a good use case would be, and I doubt I'll ever want or one of its descendants to write a draft for me. Making it my work would feel like editing someone else's manuscript, even if it's good—which of course current AI writing isn't, but that could change. I just don't want people who think about the future professionally to assume that we'll never advance past the present.

Show thread

Jamming the two together: I'm alternately amused and annoyed by how much has doing things like , but relegates care to . Uh ...

Show thread
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.