I see someone saying a Missouri Republican is complaining about sex robots...? No, dolls. Right, dolls. No, not those tiny little things. Those mannequin like things. Because it might vaguely look like a minor. Vague fuzzy language. Anyway... Please. Let me rest. I don't have time for this. You know damn well it's a bad idea, and it violates the 1st and 14th Amendment... By now... Don't you...? All it would do is create a shitshow. A shitshow that just so happens to also be unconstitutional.
https://qoto.org/@olives/111016310514191221 My resources are very limited, and I simply don't have the time to come up with something very processed and fresh. There, you go.
I'm fairly sure this is mentioned in there, but I suppose I should repeat it, curiously, I've seen a legal association make the following argument (in this sort of case) before. If someone is up to evil, then there are other laws which someone can use against them...
The argument against prohibition right now is stronger now than it ever was (and it's only going to get stronger, judging by what I've seen).
It's pretty much come out of nowhere after being settled for quite some time. I don't really want to open the can of worms right now though.