#Ubuntu is surprisingly unresponsive compared to Windows. Launching programs can take 5-10 seconds (with no indication that anything is happening). Resizing a window sometimes resizes the frame and then takes a second to fill in the contents. Even the internet seems slow to respond.
Some of this might be due to the fact that Ubuntu is running off a physical hard drive while Windows was running off an SSD, but that doesn't seem sufficient to explain it.
I would have expected to get *more* performance without Microsoft constantly uploading data. Does this match anyone else's experience? Any ideas?
@peterdrake Something seems way off there; possibly a video driver issue. While running on a rotational drive will certainly be slower than solid state, in my experience a Linux distro on a rotational is about as responsive as Winblows on a solid state.
If you're running an nvidia graphics card, make sure you're running their driver. I've encountered this behaviour with nvidia cards without their driver blob running.
@cdp1337 I just downloaded fresh drivers from NVIDIA.
@cdp1337 I have no program called smartctl.
The hard drive isn't that old (and hasn't been heavily used), so I doubt that's the problem.
Nothing sticks out from top or iotop.
@peterdrake `smartctl` is provided via the package smartmontools.
It could just be that all the recent work on various packages don't play nicely with rotational drives anymore... I dunno. It's been a good number of years since I ran any OS on rotational drives, (the only use I have of them anymore are archive drives for a NAS).