#Ubuntu is surprisingly unresponsive compared to Windows. Launching programs can take 5-10 seconds (with no indication that anything is happening). Resizing a window sometimes resizes the frame and then takes a second to fill in the contents. Even the internet seems slow to respond.
Some of this might be due to the fact that Ubuntu is running off a physical hard drive while Windows was running off an SSD, but that doesn't seem sufficient to explain it.
I would have expected to get *more* performance without Microsoft constantly uploading data. Does this match anyone else's experience? Any ideas?
@mekuso I appreciate the advice, but this is exactly what I was hoping to avoid.
Web: Interested in trying Linux? Ubuntu is a good choice for beginners. It's easy to set up and has reasonable defaults.
Experts (in unison): Oh god, anything but that!
30-hour rabbit hole: You should really be using the Svirfneblin distribution. It's still in beta, but if you just recompile the kernel...
I want the least needy OS.
@mekuso It's at least on the list here:
https://www.zdnet.com/article/best-linux-desktops-for-beginners/
It's #1 here:
https://itsfoss.com/best-linux-beginners/
It's also what we use in our Linux CS teaching lab; consistency is worth something.
@peterdrake I'm curious who recommended Ubuntu to you. It used to be the most beginner friendly but that was many years ago. That said, it's not exactly a bad distro. It's just that for the very specific matter of how fast desktop applications launch, Ubuntu is not representative of Linux in general, it's lagging behind everyone else significantly.
Most seem to recommend Linux Mint for beginners now, and that's something I can very much get behind. But it's just one of many good options.