@sean If you're going to use Apple products, don't try to be clever. Do what they tell you to. If you don't like it, use a different system.
@NoraReed Dr Who has an episode with statues that only moved when no human was looking at them.
@lcamtuf Bad news, guys. https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2023-3824/
@grmpyprogrammer LLMs don't give answers, only suggestions. I think they're great at what they're for, i.e. advanced autocomplete. You have to verify their suggestions ofc.
Kelloggs is worth $19B & made $1.6B in profit in 2023.
So as 1 in 4 military families, 1 in 6 Americans, & 1 in 9 children are food insecure—Kellogg's boasts about celebrating that insecurity & advertises "cereal for dinner."
Shameful. Greedy. Cruel. smh
https://www.businessinsider.com/personal-finance/kellogg-ceo-cereal-dinner-save-money-2024-2
@QasimRashid This is quite close to "let the eat cake".
@fancysandwiches @KimSJ I think spam in results points to the search engine being garbage, not the sites.
@TheBreadmonkey Even more if it's organic gold.
@CelloMomOnCars @krans @vfrmedia @publixpace @rebeccawatson It's as if public safety issues are complex and data on it is easy to misinterpret.
@publixpace @rebeccawatson Sounds perfectly sensible if you can guarantee the incentives will align. Otherwise the local tourism board might decide that having no reported accidents makes for a better holiday destination, or something of that nature. Sounds like the Germans are giving it a good go.
@publixpace @rebeccawatson That's clever, but doesn't mean speed limits are useless, otherwise they'd never switch.
@publixpace @rebeccawatson Well, it might be factually true, sorry.
@publixpace @rebeccawatson This is factually untrue and wouldn't mean much anyway. Some of the lowest road accident rates are found in countries which not only have conservative speeding limits but also harsh penalties for speeding - in Norway going 30 km/h over the speed limit can cost you the equivalent of $1500.
@joacim @onemuri @gertvdijk You don't seem silenced.
@lcamtuf You assume that the non-silly articles you put effort into are objectively better. But things just have different audiences, and some of those audiences are smaller than others. "The neo-Marxist agenda wants to destroy capitalism that has built all you see around you" and "we need to move towards a more equitable economic system that will let us avoid the sad outcomes of what capitalism has brought upon us" are essentially the same information, but very different audiences.
@grmpyprogrammer @preinheimer Before internet there were pretty much no reviews, or you had to collect review magazines :) And reviews in those were not that reliable either.
I think we can figure it out, product identity, personal identity, federated trustworthiness maybe.
@fox Car recalls are also pretty good.
Husband of a smart, outspoken woman, father of two little girls. ❄️ Peace and quiet enthusiast. 💾 PHP/Node/Java/Go dev 🤗 He/him.🍹 Unfollowable. https://ninozaur.com