@11112011 don't do it you've got great tits

@skells
Screenshot 2022-09-12 at 20-06-33 Eamon Ryan no Twitter.png

@11112011 https://www.world-nuclear-news.org/Articles/Hungary-and-Rosatom-push-ahead-on-Paks-II-nuclear

someone's got to keep the lights on

@skells yea but nukes take much longer to build than wind

@11112011 15 years yeah, but unless you can find some serious batteries....

@skells https://www.power-technology.com/projects/windfloat-atlantic-project/

@11112011 25MW lel

@skells that was just the pilot

@11112011 the problem remains - how do you match the grid load when these things drop off?

@11112011 you're gonna need a fuckload of hydro (also sensitive to climate conditions) or fossil fuels/nukes

renewables can be run as supplementary, sure, but not core energy

@skells u get it from other places
imagem.png

@11112011 that synchronisation fragilises the system in proportion to use of renewables

@skells the grid needs to match generation with consumption thats why crying that adding renewables doesnt make sense, u on the field of ideology

@11112011 it's not ideology it's electrical engineering

renewables (other than hydro) are volatile and you need alternatives when generation falls below consumption

@skells its pure ideology all added generation is gud

@11112011 don't have a problem with renewables, i have a problem with euro wonks blindly ideologueing the continent into an energy crisis

putin is just the catalyst, this sucker has been brewing for a while

@skells so u dont have a problem wit added generation independence

@11112011 ofc not

@skells
imagem.png

It's really not. Add enough renewables and you can have spot prices drop to zero, or even go negative. You're basically forcing the conventional providers to act as grid stabilizers for the renewables, meanwhile they don't get to sell electricity when the grid is producing.

@dave @skells prices down gud

@11112011 @dave

Legacy providers need to make money to stay in business dude. I know we *eventually* need to shut them all off, but (safe) nuclear is expensive right now, and miracle batteries are still 5-10 years away, just like they were 20 years ago. You can't shut them off until you have a real viable replacement.

@dave @skells nukes take 15 years to build

@dave @skells no one needs to make money
imagem.png

@dave @11112011 @skells

Can confirm, we get negative spot prices sometimes. In Australia they have negative spot prices during the daily solar panel peak.

In New Zealand we use geothermal, rather than nuclear for the base load electricity.

Our geothermal plants produce about 20% of our electricity.

You could build geothermal plants in most countries that have hot springs or volcanoes.

@DazzaNZ @dave @11112011 that's wild

@DazzaNZ @dave @11112011 what happens when you run out of magma

@skells @DazzaNZ @dave no no no renewables bad

@dave @11112011 @skells

This is a good point.

The base load, geothermal, keeps everything going overnight, where stuff that stays on all night is the base load.

Then in the morning, they let water out of the top dams, which generates breakfast rush power.

The water runs down the river where a dam generates the lunchtime rush. Then later the dinner peak.

The dams store and don't generate if wind and solar are generating.

Gas generate for peaks responsive to sudden demand in Auckland.

@DazzaNZ @dave @11112011 @skells
"In this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics..."
https://youtu.be/Dc-m9dumEaw

"$0.63 of grease from $27 of bacon..."
https://youtu.be/FYlZd__XFro

Mark Shepard on Restoration Agriculture - "Annual agriculture is all about living through our concepts... our idea we've imposed on reality & when reality doesn't behave according to our idea, what do we do? We input... we can never input enough to make our false concept correct." http://bit.ly/1GnbtAA

@js290 @DazzaNZ @dave @skells do u own a car