@csddumi I agree with you but this is a bit handwavy, could you be more precise
@yogthos@mastodon.social of course not, can't take away from your personal experience
I know many Russians who consistently deplore the Communist regime; those who spent their entire life under it, are particularly against the USSR.
to draw a line under the debate, I have no doubt that China does a great many things better than the West. I suspect that there may be a Bismarck effect going on, where contradictions are being swept under the rug to the detriment of the political health of the country in the long term (see, Germany, Russia for historical precedents)
I'm ill informed and receiving propaganda from both sides so I agree that I have limited ability to make a call. But please don't imagine that China has circumvented the dangers of power and governance because *Communism* when historically it has such a poor track record.
@yogthos@mastodon.social
as I said, if the Tongs (perhaps I'm using the wrong terminology) have genuine strength then fair enough
the reality is that many of the evils that concern me, lack of civil liberties, freedom of speech, right to protest etc. appear to be basic assumptions of the Chinese system.
Perhaps their people are happier for it but I am skeptical of their reports that everything is hunky dory, as I am skeptical of reports from my own government.
To bring it back to the source of the debate, the state controlling media and public debate is not grounds for a healthy system anywhere, in my view. If you have credible evidence that the Chinese state listens to and is open to vocal opposition then I'm interested to see it.
@yogthos@mastodon.social
the people have no say in how their country is run and opposition is generally met by a sudden disappearance
social and economic stability can be gamed for decades - the low standard of living in China pre-CCP gives plenty of low hanging fruit, when this stops, will the CCP reform to become more responsive to the needs of their people?
where is Jack Ma?
Any decision maker not subject to democratic control will eventually act against the common good and in favor of their own advantage.
All decision makers need to be subject to strong, direct and universal democratic control. Otherwise they'll not act in the interest of the commons consistently.
We need more democratic society, economy and state.
@csddumi historically this requires an independent and politically active middle class with some leisure
@yogthos@mastodon.social I'm under no illusions about the state of late stage capitalism, particularly in America.
To state outright that the CCP represents the people is not bourne out by their lack of political expression.
Let's assume for sake of arguement that the CCP and the people's interests are well-enough aligned at the moment (forgetting certain authoritarian and genocidal proclivities for the moment...)
What do you do once the low-hanging fruit are plucked? Can the CCP adapt to that situation or will is simply lockdown any and all opposition?
If the Tongs have more power and influence under the hood then I'm willing to listen, but you can sweep a lot of bullshit under the rug when you're in charge of a regime such as the CCP.
The European Commission has just announced an agreement whereby English will be the official language of the European Union rather than German, which was the other possibility.
@vriska
> mainly I sell swords BUT WOULD YOU LIKE TO PLAY SOME GWENT
dialogue dreamt up by the utterly deranged