@NEETzsche @lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242
>morally disgusting.
I think the only answers you'll accept involve reject absolute morality.
My answer is that life is difficult and unpleasant and sometimes there aren't nice answers. Sometimes the bad people win.

@swiley @lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242 Well, that’s why you need bad men. They keep the other bad men at the door or, if they breach it, kick them out. That’s why, even though I find wignats irritating, they have a point, a point that can’t be casually dismissed by calling them racists or whatever, that must be abided and met.

“Whitey doesn’t get replaced” is a mandatory goalpost that must be met; the debate on that has closed, in their favor. They’ve earned their seat at the table. They either get that seat at the table, or other people start losing their seats at the table.

@NEETzsche @lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242 Yeah and that's part of why I didn't want poa.st blocked. It seems like we can still talk though, it's not clear to me what exactly happened.

@swiley @lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242 The TRS crowd is full of people who have been kept silent for too long. I’m one of those people, but I “made it,” so I can comfortably intellectualize it a bit more than, say, someone who got passed over for college because they have a name like “Cletus.” Or someone who has to work for some black wahmen manager who didn’t earn that position and got it for diversity reasons.

Cletus has moral license to attack the credibility of academia over that treatment, and by extension the rest of the system that takes academia seriously, which is pretty much all of it. Having a fairly Cletus-y background myself, and being on the receiving end of University racial struggle sessions, I get it. I think it’s misguided to think posting gigachad memes on Poast is going to solve anything, and a lot of users there do seem to think things like that, but that doesn’t change my overall stance.

The bottom line from all of that is that I win, or other people lose. After the racial treatment myself and so many others faced, our restraint is payment unto itself. For this reason, I recommend white men do maximize three things:

How much value they can create (trades, intellectual property, more white people),
How much value they can destroy (everything from reputational damage, to property destruction, to loss of life), and
The amount of time they can persist without external help as individuals

White men should be judicious with the first, and be proud of their work. They should be merciless with the second, actively hurting anybody who displays hostility toward them, which of course includes all institutions that levy affirmative action or CRT type policies against them. They should be fastidious with the third, preparing months and years of rations ahead of time in case they need to reconnoiter in a destabilization event.

@NEETzsche @lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242
I'll agree with your recommendation and say that not just white men but all men should do those three things. All men are dangerous by nature but the useless ones become tools for the wicked.

I'm not sure I agree with your argument for it. It's clear that many (most?) universities are actively racially discriminating but not all do. You'll likely find that the ones who don't discriminate based on race (like the one I went to ) behave the way they do on principle. These institutions recognize their purpose in empowering the most capable people to improve the world around them.

I think you're fighting the wrong fight. You should fight for Civilization and Principles, not race. There are two reasons:
One: A principled civilization detests genocide. There's no better way to secure the future of *any* race than principles. People of all groups and races can recognize how abandoning principles potentially jeopardizes their group.
Two: fighting a war on race can only lead to destruction. By dividing us racially the architects of terrible evils like genocide make the fight even harder. This is what the Germans chose in the early 20th century and it worked out in a predictable way: they were beaten and an incredible number of them were raped by Russians.

If you reason with materialism and not principles you end in ruin.
If you fight for your race and not Civilization you'll damn it.

@swiley You need to reconcile your ideology with reality, not the other way around. If there’s a conflict in front of you, you take your own side and engage in that conflict. If that conflict is on racial grounds, you take sides on racial grounds.

This isn’t something you can abstract away. I didn’t choose for race to be a major issue. It just is. I see a lot of people trying to cope their way out of this one. If you’re being denied based on race, the issue isn’t “Civilization” and it’s not “Principles.” The issue is race.

So, I’m intent on correcting the issue.

@lichelordgodfrey @RoyalJohnny242