Show newer

With things generally moving off public mailing lists into "better" forums, GitHub, Discord, Zulip, whatever doesn't matter - it's just obvious we've collectively created a digital Dark Age. danielpocock.com/en/mailing-li

What about a shiny Crystal 1.19.0 release for the new year?

The compiler now uses execution contexts and parallel LLVM codegen on all targets (including Windows) a new Time::Instant type, compile time flags with values, and many runtime improvements and fixes.

See all the details in the release notes: crystal-lang.org/2026/01/15/1.

@corbet

When anyone with an @google.com address visits LWN, give them an HTTP redirect to news.google.com/search?q=slop+ ?

(Alternatively, the editor of Housefresh wrote about their slop struggle, "If I had to guess why our site has recovered, I’d say it has more to do with our open letters to Google engineers, where we clearly outlined how their biased algorithm was leading searchers to bad products."

linkedin.com/posts/activity-74

)

So somebody took a couple of LWN's recent conference articles, threw them into an LLM blender with some other stuff, and produced ... this ...

https://www.webpronews.com/linux-kernels-future-tab-integrates-rust-navigates-ai-boosts-collaboration/

Google News propagates that stuff - something they have long refused to do with LWN's original material. But somehow we're supposed to continue to exist to feed material into that machine?

Sorry, having a grumpy day.

I'll go further: If your code makes use of "AI" code generators, you shouldn't be describing it as "open source". Imagine a source-available game mod of Mario 64 or Ocarina of Time made by forking code stolen from Nintendo servers. That wouldn't actually be "open source".

OSS/Libre/Free Software is a project to build a commons based on consensual collaboration. You can't claim those labels when your project has, via "AI" scraping, contributors who are unknown, uncredited, and unconsenting.

Show thread

let's just agree to abolish copyright! ai companies can have all the data, and pirating is legally protected

Allow reviewing packages before installation

The recent commit below by @pkal makes me proud to be part of the #Emacs community. Part of what makes Emacs special is that not only it is distributed under a #FreeSoftware license, but it also works hard to make it easy for you to take advantage of that power, best evidenced by the way a simple mouse click after M-x describe-key puts you right there in the source code, ready to change the behavior of that key.

Now this is extended to encourage you to participate in code reviews of the packages you use. I hope you will make good use of it, both to get to know your tools better, and to participate more meaningfully in their evolution.

cgit.git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit

@caten right on!

Thanks @tonyg@leastfixedpoint.com for boosting the above.

I felt part of it can be done by a convention of file:///magnet/ URI's combined with something like bittorrentfs. "discover" a link, file:///magnet/some_magnet_uri/, and click on it in the browser; the underlying file system torrents it and index.html renders in your browser.

@flypaper I have now, and I definitely don't want the crypto or LLM stuff. It's not enough that I could choose not to use those features. I drop software that supports them.

@caten

>I just want to be able to load a webpage from a bittorrent swarm

But how would you know its magnet link?

The p2p web also needs content discovery.

@felipe some self-hosting blasphemy: do a Whatsapp poll in groups with likely takers.

@lxo I was told ownership (of land) came from Hobbs, with a feudal-Christian background of extracting value ftom nature.

Until ownership was brought into India under colonialism, which land was tilled by whom for a given period of time was decided by community; land was a commons (infrastructure like irrigation was too).

@lxo any alternative would also be maligned with the wrong term.

If you give control over business organization to society, it would be via government - and that would be called socialism/communism, even if it is very different and more like a board of directors in a corporate setup.

No brouhaha if Google splits into a few pieces under Alphabet, but "communism" if it had been a few pieces under government control (not even government shareholding).

@lxo it is fantastic how much you evolve a piece further in a single day!

@1a1nC You don’t argue with them. They’re trying to waste your time. Engaging at all is losing.

@lxo you raise a good point, but the have-lots likely have options to take care of it if government is in their pocket.

@nblr I can forgive the newline being required, but the failure being silent is unforgiveable.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.