Look, the Democrats on here tell me I'm not allowed to question Biden's record on economics, cops, race and especially genocide.
So I'm stuck with the last thing I'm evidently allowed to talk about.
Swagger & Riz and let me tell you I have pretty high standards especially for genocidal old men.
Just look at this man's dapping skills would you please?
@cy
Arguing "they are both bad" is not in contradiction with "Trump is bad", and if you make "he's not Trump" the central argument in favour of Biden, obviously anyone who isn't Trump will do just as well.
With this background I don't think it's useful to demand every critical thread about Biden have a "obviously Trump is a disaster" disclaimer at the start.
But maybe of you put "obviously I don't like that Biden is supporting a genocide" notice in every pro-Biden toot things gets interesting: let everyone be the muslim condemning terrorist violence whenever they have to speak about cheese tarrifs.
@nullagent
@cy
The idea that someone would write a short text about a single topic is suspicious? Weird position to have, but ok.
It is also wrong to say people are attacking the party when the discussion is clearly about the candidate the party intends to field, which actually hasn't been formally decided, that happens towards the end of August.
Also, I'm a bit sorry for you as it sounds like you are unable to ignore banner ads...
I don't think it's useful to demand every critical thread about Biden have a "obviously Trump is a disaster" disclaimer at the start.
And yet they don't. It's kind of suspicious. Basic human psychology says if you put something in our face often enough, it will take our attention away from other things. They know that, so they should always draw attention to everybody's faults, not write articles only about Donald or Joe. I'd be overjoyed if Jill was President, but until we fix the system not to be rigged against third parties, attacking the one party implies supporting the other.