Look, the Democrats on here tell me I'm not allowed to question Biden's record on economics, cops, race and especially genocide.
So I'm stuck with the last thing I'm evidently allowed to talk about.
Swagger & Riz and let me tell you I have pretty high standards especially for genocidal old men.
Just look at this man's dapping skills would you please?
@cy
Arguing "they are both bad" is not in contradiction with "Trump is bad", and if you make "he's not Trump" the central argument in favour of Biden, obviously anyone who isn't Trump will do just as well.
With this background I don't think it's useful to demand every critical thread about Biden have a "obviously Trump is a disaster" disclaimer at the start.
But maybe of you put "obviously I don't like that Biden is supporting a genocide" notice in every pro-Biden toot things gets interesting: let everyone be the muslim condemning terrorist violence whenever they have to speak about cheese tarrifs.
@nullagent
@cy
The idea that someone would write a short text about a single topic is suspicious? Weird position to have, but ok.
It is also wrong to say people are attacking the party when the discussion is clearly about the candidate the party intends to field, which actually hasn't been formally decided, that happens towards the end of August.
Also, I'm a bit sorry for you as it sounds like you are unable to ignore banner ads...
Suspicious doesn't mean guilty, just it's a red flag. If one guy is a paragon of virtue, fine, but if they're both fucked up, and all I hear is people writing "short texts" about one of them, it kind of makes their political stance clear.