“There is an inherent tendency in towards cronyism, and democracy enhances it. That means that capitalism is not sustainable in a , and those of us who defend need to take that part of the argument from the left seriously. is not the opposite of capitalism. It is something that capitalism turns into in a political system that allows , and we should be worried about that. We should credit that as legitimate .”

, on the podcast

libertarianism.org/podcasts/fr

@tripu It's definitely a problem but I don't see how democracy is the root cause. Isn't there cronyism too when democracy isn't present?

The Dark Enlightenment makes pretty convincing arguments in that regard, in support of a monarchy, but I'm not sold. Maybe something like Elon Musk proposes; IIRC, supermajority to pass a new law, but simple majority to abolish it.

Switzerland seems to be doing fine while many monarchies aren't.

Follow

@gasull
I think that within secular, liberal, parliamentary democracies, that distinction between monarchies and republics is moot. Switzerland could very well have a King and be as prosperous as it is, and I don't think replacing the King of Norway with a President would change much, either…

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.