Follow

The irreducible question that will determine the future (or lack thereof) of , , ’s, and even is:

Can sufficiently advanced fix, or at least cancel out, the mendacity and fallibility of any mass of human beings — flaws that have manifested themselves invariably through History?

Examples:

👉 A friend told me recently that central planning of the economy could actually, finally, work this time, today or in the near future, because increasing computing power means that ’s “knowledge problem” is gone. (I remain sceptical.)

👉 For a while it seemed that , the and wars, etc meant that individual investors could coordinate against the money behemoths to make markets more fair and fix injustices. (I was sceptical from the beginning, and I think I am more or less vindicated by now.)

👉 Are DAO’s viable and efficient beyond very limited, fringe experiments?

👉 Can we be confident enough that , , etc won’t rewrite their chains and change the rules as they go to serve contingent interests?

👉 Can , , etc actually, finally work this time if we entrust governance to a very sophisticated {network, protocol, chain, algorithm}?

Humans will always be able to override code, or lead the masses to ignore certain segments of code.

@tripu

“Can sufficiently advanced fix, or at least cancel out, the mendacity and fallibility of any mass of human beings — flaws that have manifested themselves invariably through History?”

Yes, genetic engineering. Or, in a post-transhumanism world, self-modifying code.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.