I am genuinely interested to understand how can a scientist claim that the new mRNA vaccine technology is 100% safe and doesn’t have any significant long term health effects?

There is a clear bias in the scientific community, pharmaceutical companies and public health authorities to push one simplistic narrative that the mRNA vaccine is safe and effective. Any dissenting opinion questioning the mRNA vaccine safety or efficacy is labeled idiot, conspiracy theorist and anti-vax.

This toxic scientific debate climate makes critical data gathering and research challenging. Most career driven scientists, medical doctors or researchers don’t want to go against the main narrative and lose their credentials and livelihood.

Questioning the safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines represent a threat to the institutions mandating and advocating for that technology. A threat that might lead to vaccine hesitancy, lost in credibility, lost of financial revenue and legal liability.

There are few brave scientists with a good track records of scientific research, publications and citations. I can’t name them all, these are a few top ones that I followed their work on this topic:

There is a clear signal form various public heath safety reporting data bases and scientific research that show an increase risk of Myocarditis after the mRNA injections:

Myocarditis is one advert event among many that Pfizer own clinical trials has revealed even before vaccine mass deployment.

I can’t personally ignore or dismiss renown scientific researchers and medical doctors warnings regarding the vaccine safety and efficacy. I am not against vaccines in general, they truly save lives.

I am strongly against vaccine mandates and vaccine passports, especially since the vaccines were never tested or designed to stop the transmission.

I don’t want to live in a future dystopian technocracy were the state controls all aspects of my life, I am pro choice, liberty and informed consent.

I hope that everyone that took the mRNA shots are and will be alright.

@freemo Dr. Freemo if you reading up to this, I hope you consider the scientific research I shared here, and acknowledge the concerns that some people have regarding the mRNA vaccines.

🎓 Dr. Freemo :jpf: 🇳🇱  
@ringo If i wasnt clear about my position, your an idiot if you still think the shot is dangerous at this point, though I would have agreed with ex...

@voidabyss @freemo

mRNA technology had been studied and developed for almost 30 years *before* Covid struck.

The Obama administration funded additional research into using the mRNA technology for creating vaccines quickly and safely.

mRNA isn't new.

@voidabyss @freemo

Check your sources. Life Site News is an extremely bias propaganda site. You basically just confirmed my argument.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/life-si

Follow

@jpop @freemo
Yes I confirmed your argument, mRNA technology isn’t new, it has been used to create new vaccines.

If you didn’t like that website you can check the source video youtu.be/OJFKBritLlc?t=5859

@voidabyss @freemo

Why would I want to watch a source propaganda video for the extremely bias article you cited?

mRNA is not new and neither is the technology for creating vaccines from it.

Now, you have already proven you can't do your own research by citing propaganda. I think you should quit now and let the real experts do the hard work going forward.

@jpop

You proven yourself to be an idiot who can’t even differentiate between propaganda and source materiel from the World Health Summit.

Not wasting my time with a dumb troll.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.