Show newer

@GottaLaff It's funny because Trump personally came out celebrating being completely vindicated, and his supporters said the same thing, getting the court ruling completely backwards.

So I guess he has at least some adults working for him who actually read the court case and realized he lost.

I don't think Trump and his people realize they lost.

@ppatel The new executive order is just posturing like everything else this President does

@continuation you say that, but that's not what I'm hearing from queer activists.

@EveHasWords you have no right to privacy in public. It's mainly a question of whether the people you elect to government fund these programs.

@Peter_Link meh That's sensationalism. Executive orders proposing to violate law are simply invalid.

@libramoon the Texas legislature is not the federal Congress. So no.

@sgt1372 @bicmay

@bicmay

The critical thing is that it says what it says regardless of what you do or don't want to find out about.

@sgt1372

@gkmizuno honestly I want a lot less.

KJ was going off the deep end, as she often does, and plenty of people are pointing out that she doesn't seem to know what's going on in the world. I would like a lot less of her blabber.

KJ has no doubt. Well maybe she should have some doubts because she doesn't know what she's talking about.

The other Supreme Court Justices constantly try to give her remedial courses on how the courts work. She really is an embarrassment.

@libramoon

Congress shall make no law? Well isn't about making law.

@sgt1372 @bicmay

@libramoon

The problem is that yes, it is very explicit, and no, What it explicitly says doesn't support that stance.

@sgt1372 @bicmay

@gkmizuno sure, none of those majority opinions back your claims.

Want to try again?

@kurtsh this post doesn't seem to understand the concept of co-equal branches of government. It is because of the rule of law that the executive branch can manage its own business.

@GeriAQuin there's nothing inconsistent about that.

One was about taking money from people and the other was about spending money. Yeah, Congress can dictate that students have to pay taxes, but on the other hand it can't dictate that the executive branch has to spend money.

If you understand how the US government works, this post is just spouting ignorance.

@lillyfinch No, that's the opposite of what's happening.

Whoever posted that is promoting a conspiracy theory that just doesn't match the historical record or how the US government actually works.

Please don't promote this kind of nonsense. It's antisocial.

@lillyfinch that makes for a nice conspiracy theory, but it doesn't match the record. And it doesn't even match how the US system of government works.

That's just wacko conspiracy theory stuff.

No, if you look at the legislative record that didn't happen. And why would it? We elect our own congresspeople, they get booted out of office if we don't like what they do.

This is just nonsense.

@sgt1372 maybe they started paying attention to the fact that it wasn't written into the Constitution?

@bicmay

Language 

@djghettoredneck you really don't understand what's going on.

You're really upset based on propaganda. They are manipulating you.

volkris boosted

I've upgraded my instance to Mastodon v4.4 from v4.3...

I did not put in my any of my custom patches. It would have required work I did not wish to put in...

and I immediately regretted it...

Mastodon is a mess without my patches. Yep, I submitted them to their GitHub. They got no traction beyond the occasional "can you rebase this." Yes, sure, I'm going to rebase it, and again, and again, and again,.... because Mastodon is my 24/7 job. (Newsflash: it isn't.)

It does look like I'm going to have to rework them now because without them Mastodon is nigh unusable.

I love the fediverse. I hate Mastodon. I just hate it less than the alternatives. (Yes, I've tried them. They sucked, hard.)

#Mastodon #PR #fediverse

@RememberUsAlways

No, that's not historically accurate.

Districting has always been up to the states, the state legislatures in particular. It wasn't some reckless decision of the Supreme Court, it's just how the United States is set up from the beginning.

And really it's up to Congress to change if they want to, but that comes down to the people that we elect to Congress. We have all of these congresspeople yelling about it when really it's up to them to change it if they want to. If they're not changing it and we want them to change it then we need to stop reelecting the same people who don't change it.

We keep reelecting the congresspeople that enable this. Stop reelecting the congresspeople that enable this.

Don't let them point fingers at the Supreme Court to escape accountability.

@solaris

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.