volkris @volkris@qoto.org
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
Out of curiosity, because I haven't read it, what specifically might be unconstitutional about it?
Watching the screw-ups in the Comey prosecution right now I’m just thinking #TACO , #Trump Always Chickens Out, should be joined by #TOFU , Trump O...
Watching the screw-ups in the Comey prosecution right now I’m just thinking #TACO , #Trump Always Chickens Out, should be joined by #TOFU , Trump O...
@dnkboston sure, when the parties put up people worth voting for.
If we vote regardless of the quality of candidates then sanctions low quality candidates who do us disservice once they are in office. We need higher standards.
Otherwise we get ::gestures:: all of this
@sleepy62 those are humans spreading AI images.
Don't let the humans off the hook.
The biggest #Trump supporting influencers helping shape conservative thought and US policy, ladies and gentlemen. God they're morons.
Right now the US is caught between senile boomers and young people who are more interested in taking shots of Fireball at tailgate parties than knowing how the world works.
Pretty much explains the whole situation.
#ClayAndBuck: We did our research before the show, and we can tell you that Kharg Island is really important to #Iran because that's where they re...
I honestly don't understand what you mean with that.
What do you mean by fork the changes?
Understand that this administration, and much of the #GOP that's setting US policy, is driven by boomer nostalgia based on naive misundertandings of history.
From wanting to bring back battleships through wanting to return to good ol' days of white picket fences and family values, that's why they constantly refer in rosy terms to irrelevant scenes of times that never were.
And all of that while these authorities age into senility.
#AllenWest and #BrianKilmeade:The US could could enable shipping through the Strait of Hormuz by applying tactics used during the D-Day landings a...
Someone is misinforming you about what's going on here, as what you're saying is factually wrong.
NO the SCOTUS didn't refuse to hear a case based on the principle that copyright only applies to human expression. That's not even what the lower court said, so the Supreme Court wouldn't have refused based on that in the first place, even if they were going to give an explanation.
Copyright is not human expression. That's not what the courts say, and that's not what the law says.
This case is about regulatory process in context of statutory implementation of constitutional authority.
Here's what the Supreme Court actually said, directly from them. It's at the top of page 3. And it's nothing. They simply weren't interested in the case.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030226zor_2d8f.pdf
#ClayAndBuck: We were really hoping the administration would announce some sort of plan for what comes next for #Iran, but I guess there just isn'...
Well, there's a fundamental argument about whether the Federal Reserve Board IS such an independent agency in the first place, or if it's something different.
SCOTUS has hinted that there might be a distinction with a difference.
@ike unfortunately the people that we elected to Congress, those Democrats, have proven to be completely ineffective.
And yet we will re-elect them anyway.
@cazabon or we could just stop reelecting the same politicians who let us down.
We like these people. We make that decision.
Keep in mind that this administration follows the orders of Fox News type commentators. They'll say things and then a couple days later the administration will echo what they said.
So Trump decided to start the war because Fox News commentators said it would be pretty awesome in their hyperpatriotic us versus them, good guy versus bad guy, let's have footage of fighter jets mentality.
And that's as far as they think.
@albnelson sure
That's the nice thing about being Trump, at any point he will arbitrarily declare success and say he's awesome.
@nixCraft Well we mainly just need to stop voting for the lawmakers that make these laws.
We actively reelect them. We should probably stop doing that.
@jazzilla Well more fundamentally, it's an educational failure.
It's a population of people that have been misled and misinformed. They have come to believe a bunch of falsehoods.
The moral and spiritual aspects are built on top of factual beliefs. If the factual beliefs are wrong, well then moral and spiritual can't really save the day.
@wjmaggos It's not about capitalism. This is government, the exact opposite.
If anything it would be more accurate to say we must collectively reconsider how democracy works.
Yeah, people are voting to kill lots of foreigners. Yay democracy.
It doesn't sound like the vehicles are unusable. They're just different from what they used before because they're marked.
Sounds like the article is trying too hard to make a flashy story.
I think the most pressing and fundamental problem of the day is that people lack a practically effective means of sorting out questions of fact in the larger world. We can hardly begin to discuss ways of addressing reality if we can't agree what reality even is, after all.
The institutions that have served this role in the past have dropped the ball, so the next best solution is talking to each other, particularly to those who disagree, to sort out conflicting claims.
Unfortunately, far too many actively oppose this, leaving all opposing claims untested. It's very regressive.
So that's my hobby, striving to understanding the arguments of all sides at least because it's interesting to see how mythologies are formed but also because maybe through that process we can all have our beliefs tested.
But if nothing else, social media platforms like this are chances to vent frustrations that on so many issues both sides are obviously wrong ;)
Joined Dec 2022
volkris's choices:
