Show newer

No, isn't causing a constitutional crisis. The Constitution has mechanisms in place to address everything that's happening here. There's no crisis, there's just a need to apply the constitutional order.

But, I just keep thinking that yelling constitutional crisis must be referring to their own crisis wherein the Constitution just doesn't provide them with the tools to impose their political preferences on the country after voters rejected them.

It's a crisis of party, not of Constitution.

They should put forward better candidates than this.

volkris boosted

Most history books don't mention this for some reason.

Recently a friend said we're about to see the Red Lobstering of the , referring to the time the restaurant chain was bought out, had its supply chain directed vertically, and then sent into bankruptcy.

At first I thought he was just going on one of his normally nutty rants, but then I realized he had a point, just in the opposite way from what he meant.

We've been in the Red Lobstering process for a long time. Measures ranging from national debt through public dissatisfaction with how power has been used point to that.

So what we're seeing now is the end of the story, not the beginning: the bankruptcy.

I always point out that is the result, not the cause. In this case, he's tearing things up like the bankruptcy administrator when things can't keep going as they were.

Yes, it's painful. Bankruptcy always is. And it didn't have to be this way.

But here we are.

volkris boosted

No, didn't blame yesterday's crash on during his press conference today. What he did was much more obscene: since he didn't make the causal connection, that means he used the occasion to politicize a tragedy to go off on a different political tangent that rambled out into the utterly bizarre as he started reading off of his printed out papers.

When folks say things like Trump blamed DEI, that only increases his support among voters who are obsessed with taking down DEI. Don't give him that. Just be honest that he spewed a bunch of garbage and politicized a tragedy.

After all, misrepresenting Trump in ways favorable to his base is part of how we got him reelected in the first place. If we were honest about him, even his own supporters would reject him.

volkris boosted

I cant believe ChatGPT lost its job to Al

volkris boosted

PSA: You can use the suffix "in:library" in Mastodon search to find posts you interacted with - including your bookmarks. Example: this excellent review I knew I had bookmarked a while ago. Try it yourself. And listen to Miles Davis live in Tokyo, it's amazing.

The post in the screenshot:
heads.social/@theheatwarps/113

Blogpost by Jeremy Erwin: theheatwarps.com/2022/04/21/1-

#Fediverse #FediverseTips #Mastodon #Jazz

volkris boosted
volkris boosted

@atomicpoet I think both protocols are valuable, if only to keep each other competitive and showcase different novel approaches to solving problems.

The thing that gets messy with Bluesky is in how things are quantified. There’s actually a decent amount of PDSes out there, but those aren’t the layer at which federation is necessarily happening. Data distribution and federation kind of trickle down from AppViews and Relays, which are prohibitively much more expensive to operate.

Bluesky has some really interesting architectural ideas, but whether or not it allows for decentralization in the manner that ActivityPub or Nostr do remains a matter of debate, and something of an open question.

volkris boosted

That's fine, I just want to be clear that you're talking about debating matters of fact that aren't really up for debate.

Block away. But in the end, seems like you're just blocking some information that you don't want to hear.

Yes, we can absolutely see for ourselves that these rockets are being launched and they are being developed. I don't know why you're fighting that so strongly.

Mastodon Migration  
@volkris @pdiff1 @sundogplanets Now you are sealioning and blocked.

The ruling on was really unfortunate because it was based on the justices not understanding the technology, the facts of the situation.

You could see in the oral arguments that they didn't understand how the platform was engineered, they got multiple things very wrong about it. And that's really a shame.

The role of the Supreme Court in the US is to interpret laws and review lower court rulings, but in this case the issue wasn't either of those, it was a matter of fact that they struggled with, not law.

This legal proceeding was rushed. The two sides did not have time to hammer out their factual disagreement through the normal course of the normal process. And so when it got to the Supreme Court, the Court was presented with a record with inconsistencies.

And this is why we should never try to rush these legal processes.

The justices seemed to think that a shutdown wasn't even on the table. Well, the platform shut down. The justices were proven wrong. Unfortunately, as far as I know there is no procedure for the Court to fix a factual error like this. We are stuck with this ruling until who knows when some future case might provide the opportunity to fix it.

It's legally tragic.

volkris boosted
volkris boosted

The song "All I want for Christmas is you" is insulting.

"I don't want much for Christmas...."

+

"All I want for Christmas is you."

=

You are not much.

It's in the backend protocol: in Fediverse/ActivityPub everything has to happen through instances. Instances shuttle posts around, potentially moderating them, etc. Everything happens between instances, and users just interface with an instance to send and receive content.

Just like email servers.

In contrast, BlueSky is set up so that users can post their content to any one or more servers, and pull content from one or more servers.

Fediverse/ActivityPub is all about instances talking to each other while BlueSky is about users talking to each other.

This has practical effects when it comes to everything from moderation through algorithm through account portability.

overwhelmingly voted against keeping government open.

That really gets lost in all of the media discussion about this. But it really needs to be emphasized. Did your representative vote against keeping government open? You should know that, and hold them accountable for that vote.

Remember, in the have nearly a majority of votes in the chamber.

The math says that if they wanted to, they could partner with even a few moderate to take control of the chamber outright or at least move their preferred legislation ahead.

The ONLY way a few hardliners get their way is if Democrats vote with those Republican extremists, supporting their cause.

We shouldn't let politicians point fingers at others, scoring points in this us-vs-them mentality, when they themselves have the tools to make things better.

If the government shuts down it will be because Democrats refused to break with Republican extremists and vote to pass funding.

Dems have the votes. Hold them accountable for using them.

@Chesi What are you talking about? This has nothing to do with Trump.

This is about government budgeting. Like I've said over and over, I was against this, but the people we elected to Congress chose to use income from student loans to pay for government services. That happened a while ago.

It happened before Trump was on the scene.

I really don't know why you brought him up.

@pkraus @QasimRashid

@ATLeagle it doesn't, though. That's not how any of that works, despite so many special interests misleading the public about how the economy actually works.

You're buying into a lie. I'm sorry.

@pkraus @QasimRashid

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.